-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Max retry payment limit #392
Conversation
WalkthroughThis update introduces a new Boolean field, Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant TaskLog
participant Bill
participant PaymentProcessor
User->>PaymentProcessor: Initiate Payment Creation
PaymentProcessor->>TaskLog: Check timestamps
TaskLog-->>PaymentProcessor: Return timestamps
alt If task log is older than 60 days
PaymentProcessor->>Bill: Set is_retired to True
else If task log is between 30 to 60 days
PaymentProcessor->>Bill: Process payment
else
PaymentProcessor->>Bill: Skip payment
end
Tip We have updated our review workflow to use the Anthropic's Claude family of models. Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
apps/xero/models.py (1)
205-205
: Rename the field and fix the help text for better clarity.Consider making the following changes:
- Rename the field from
is_retired
topayment_sync_retried
for better clarity on its purpose.- Fix the grammatical error in the help text. Change it from "Is Payment sync retried" to "Has payment sync been retried".
Apply this diff to implement the suggested changes:
- is_retired = models.BooleanField(help_text='Is Payment sync retried', default=False) + payment_sync_retried = models.BooleanField(help_text='Has payment sync been retried', default=False)
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- apps/xero/migrations/0010_bill_is_retired.py (1 hunks)
- apps/xero/models.py (1 hunks)
- apps/xero/tasks.py (3 hunks)
- tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql (6 hunks)
- tests/test_xero/test_tasks.py (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Ruff
tests/test_xero/test_tasks.py
5-5:
dateutil.relativedelta.relativedelta
imported but unusedRemove unused import:
dateutil.relativedelta.relativedelta
(F401)
Additional comments not posted (11)
apps/xero/tasks.py (3)
7-9
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
705-727
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
752-756
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
tests/test_xero/test_tasks.py (2)
750-754
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
1116-1174
: LGTM!The code changes are approved.
tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql (6)
6-6
: Skipped commenting on the database version upgrade.The database version upgrade from 15.7 to 15.8 is a minor change and does not require any action.
301-302
: LGTM!The addition of the
is_retired
column to thebills
table is approved.
2249-2253
: LGTM!The changes to the
COPY
command and the data entries for thebills
table are approved.
2636-2636
: LGTM!The addition of the migration entry for the
is_retired
column is approved.
5174-5174
: LGTM!The sequence update for the
django_migrations
table is approved.
6791-6791
: Skipped commenting on the empty line.The empty line at the end of the file is a minor change and does not require any action.
migrations.AddField( | ||
model_name='bill', | ||
name='is_retired', | ||
field=models.BooleanField(default=False, help_text='Is Payment sync retried'), | ||
), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Clarify the purpose of the is_retired
field.
There seems to be an inconsistency between the field name is_retired
and the help text "Is Payment sync retried". The field name suggests that the field is used to mark a bill as retired, but the help text suggests that the field is used to track whether payment sync has been retried for the bill.
Please clarify the purpose of the field and update either the field name or the help text to ensure consistency and clarity. For example:
- If the field is used to mark a bill as retired, update the help text to "Is the bill retired?".
- If the field is used to track whether payment sync has been retried for the bill, update the field name to
is_payment_sync_retried
.
tests/test_xero/test_tasks.py
Outdated
from unittest import mock | ||
from dateutil.relativedelta import relativedelta |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Remove unused import.
The import dateutil.relativedelta.relativedelta
is not used in the file.
Remove the unused import:
-from dateutil.relativedelta import relativedelta
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
from dateutil.relativedelta import relativedelta |
Tools
Ruff
5-5:
dateutil.relativedelta.relativedelta
imported but unusedRemove unused import:
dateutil.relativedelta.relativedelta
(F401)
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (2)
- apps/xero/tasks.py (3 hunks)
- tests/test_xero/test_tasks.py (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- apps/xero/tasks.py
- tests/test_xero/test_tasks.py
* Max retry payment limit * resolved flake error
No description provided.