Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Max retry payment limit #392

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 4, 2024
Merged

Max retry payment limit #392

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 4, 2024

Conversation

Ashutosh619-sudo
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Walkthrough

This update introduces a new Boolean field, is_retired, to the bill model, enhancing the tracking of payment synchronization attempts. A new function, validate_for_skipping_payment, is added to determine if payments should be skipped based on task log timestamps. Additionally, modifications are made to the test suite to ensure proper validation of the new logic and timestamp handling.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
apps/xero/migrations/0010_bill_is_retired.py Added is_retired field to bill model with default value False.
apps/xero/models.py Introduced is_retired Boolean field in Bill model.
apps/xero/tasks.py Added validate_for_skipping_payment function; modified create_payment to use this function.
tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql Updated bills table schema to include is_retired column; modified data entries accordingly.
tests/test_xero/test_tasks.py Enhanced tests for payment processing; added test_skipping_payment to validate new logic.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
    participant User
    participant TaskLog
    participant Bill
    participant PaymentProcessor

    User->>PaymentProcessor: Initiate Payment Creation
    PaymentProcessor->>TaskLog: Check timestamps
    TaskLog-->>PaymentProcessor: Return timestamps
    alt If task log is older than 60 days
        PaymentProcessor->>Bill: Set is_retired to True
    else If task log is between 30 to 60 days
        PaymentProcessor->>Bill: Process payment
    else
        PaymentProcessor->>Bill: Skip payment
    end
Loading

🐰 "In fields of green where bunnies play,
A new field blooms, hip-hip-hooray!
With is_retired, we track with glee,
Payments skipped, as happy as can be!
Hops and jumps, our code's a delight,
In the world of bills, everything's bright!" 🌼

Tip

We have updated our review workflow to use the Anthropic's Claude family of models. Please share any feedback in the discussion post on our Discord.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
apps/xero/models.py (1)

205-205: Rename the field and fix the help text for better clarity.

Consider making the following changes:

  1. Rename the field from is_retired to payment_sync_retried for better clarity on its purpose.
  2. Fix the grammatical error in the help text. Change it from "Is Payment sync retried" to "Has payment sync been retried".

Apply this diff to implement the suggested changes:

-    is_retired = models.BooleanField(help_text='Is Payment sync retried', default=False)
+    payment_sync_retried = models.BooleanField(help_text='Has payment sync been retried', default=False)
Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2582aa0 and 9be8529.

Files selected for processing (5)
  • apps/xero/migrations/0010_bill_is_retired.py (1 hunks)
  • apps/xero/models.py (1 hunks)
  • apps/xero/tasks.py (3 hunks)
  • tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql (6 hunks)
  • tests/test_xero/test_tasks.py (3 hunks)
Additional context used
Ruff
tests/test_xero/test_tasks.py

5-5: dateutil.relativedelta.relativedelta imported but unused

Remove unused import: dateutil.relativedelta.relativedelta

(F401)

Additional comments not posted (11)
apps/xero/tasks.py (3)

7-9: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.


705-727: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.


752-756: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

tests/test_xero/test_tasks.py (2)

750-754: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.


1116-1174: LGTM!

The code changes are approved.

tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql (6)

6-6: Skipped commenting on the database version upgrade.

The database version upgrade from 15.7 to 15.8 is a minor change and does not require any action.


301-302: LGTM!

The addition of the is_retired column to the bills table is approved.


2249-2253: LGTM!

The changes to the COPY command and the data entries for the bills table are approved.


2636-2636: LGTM!

The addition of the migration entry for the is_retired column is approved.


5174-5174: LGTM!

The sequence update for the django_migrations table is approved.


6791-6791: Skipped commenting on the empty line.

The empty line at the end of the file is a minor change and does not require any action.

Comment on lines +13 to +17
migrations.AddField(
model_name='bill',
name='is_retired',
field=models.BooleanField(default=False, help_text='Is Payment sync retried'),
),
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Clarify the purpose of the is_retired field.

There seems to be an inconsistency between the field name is_retired and the help text "Is Payment sync retried". The field name suggests that the field is used to mark a bill as retired, but the help text suggests that the field is used to track whether payment sync has been retried for the bill.

Please clarify the purpose of the field and update either the field name or the help text to ensure consistency and clarity. For example:

  • If the field is used to mark a bill as retired, update the help text to "Is the bill retired?".
  • If the field is used to track whether payment sync has been retried for the bill, update the field name to is_payment_sync_retried.

from unittest import mock
from dateutil.relativedelta import relativedelta
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove unused import.

The import dateutil.relativedelta.relativedelta is not used in the file.

Remove the unused import:

-from dateutil.relativedelta import relativedelta
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
from dateutil.relativedelta import relativedelta
Tools
Ruff

5-5: dateutil.relativedelta.relativedelta imported but unused

Remove unused import: dateutil.relativedelta.relativedelta

(F401)

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Sep 3, 2024

Tests Skipped Failures Errors Time
163 0 💤 0 ❌ 0 🔥 1m 10s ⏱️

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9be8529 and aeaa4b7.

Files selected for processing (2)
  • apps/xero/tasks.py (3 hunks)
  • tests/test_xero/test_tasks.py (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
  • apps/xero/tasks.py
  • tests/test_xero/test_tasks.py

@Ashutosh619-sudo Ashutosh619-sudo added the deploy Triggers deployment of active branch to Staging label Sep 3, 2024
@Ashutosh619-sudo Ashutosh619-sudo merged commit 1ef2887 into master Sep 4, 2024
4 checks passed
Ashutosh619-sudo added a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 4, 2024
* Max retry payment limit

* resolved flake error
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
deploy Triggers deployment of active branch to Staging
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants