Ordinal transaction functions

[abdulhaseeb4239]

🔘 PR Type

What kind of change does this PR introduce?

• Bugfix
• Enhancement
• Code style update (formatting, local variables)
• Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
• Build related changes
• CI related changes
• Documentation content changes
• Other... Please describe:

📜 Background

We needed to move all the ordinals transactions logic to xverse-core. Including fetching and address UTXOs and getting the correct UTXO to send.

Issue Link: https://linear.app/xverseapp/issue/ENG-2528/move-ordinal-transactions-logic-to-xverse-core
Context Link (if applicable):

🔄 Changes

I have created new functions to wrap up the existing ones. I passed the ordinal inscription and isRecover boolean. and function fetches the addressUtxos from ordinalAddress and from btcAddress if it's a recover transaction.

• Yes, Incompatible API changes
• No, Adds functionality (backwards compatible)
• No, Bug fixes (backwards compatible)

Changes:

• modified transactions/btc.ts file to add new functions for getting fees for ordinal send transactions and signing ordinal transactions.

Impact:

• This will help keep the logic consistent across the app and extension. and future changes will be much easier.
• Impact on downstream apps, link to issues or PRs for migration (TODO)
• Ordinals Transfer and Ordinal Recover

✅ Review checklist

Please ensure the following are true before merging:

• Code Style is consistent with the project guidelines.
• Code is readable and well-commented.
• No unnecessary or debugging code has been added.
• Security considerations have been taken into account.
• The change has been manually tested and works as expected.
• Breaking changes and their impacts have been considered and documented.
• Code does not introduce new technical debt or issues.

[github-actions]

Test this PR with npm i @secretkeylabs/[email protected]

[teebszet]

lgtm

[teebszet]

@abdulhaseeb4239 can we merge this, since it's a non-breaking change? can do more testing on the web-extension and mobile PRs

[abdulhaseeb4239]

@abdulhaseeb4239 can we merge this, since it's a non-breaking change? can do more testing on the web-extension and mobile PRs

yes we can merge