-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 31k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Velbus add quality_scale.yaml #131377
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Velbus add quality_scale.yaml #131377
Conversation
Hey there @brefra, mind taking a look at this pull request as it has been labeled with an integration ( Code owner commandsCode owners of
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Reading through the integration code and the checklist it seems like a bunch of the rules marked as done were not done. Perhaps you need to look a lot closer at the rules? or i'm misunderstanding a bunch of what is going on here.
Please take a look at the requested changes, and use the Ready for review button when you are done, thanks 👍 |
@allenporter it seems i misunderstood some of the requirements, after reading through the docs a second time and looking at some code. i just updated the file |
Co-authored-by: Allen Porter <[email protected]>
This integration does not do polling. | ||
brands: done | ||
common-modules: done | ||
config-flow-test-coverage: done |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
how is config-flow todo, while test-coverage is done?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the config flow is only missing data_descriptions
brands: done | ||
common-modules: done | ||
config-flow-test-coverage: done | ||
config-flow: todo |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We should not have a user configurable name in the config fow. Not a blocker, just wanted to mention it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
what name should be selected?
some people will need more then 1 of these, so they will need to know what entry is what connection
runtime-data: todo | ||
test-before-configure: done | ||
test-before-setup: todo | ||
unique-config-entry: done |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why does usb get unique id and manual setup only abort on common port?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this seems to be some legacy implementation, i already have a fix locally, will push it aftert this PR
Co-authored-by: Joost Lekkerkerker <[email protected]>
Proposed change
Add quality_scale.yaml to vvelbus
Type of change
Additional information
Checklist
ruff format homeassistant tests
)If user exposed functionality or configuration variables are added/changed:
If the code communicates with devices, web services, or third-party tools:
Updated and included derived files by running:
python3 -m script.hassfest
.requirements_all.txt
.Updated by running
python3 -m script.gen_requirements_all
.To help with the load of incoming pull requests: