feat: handle posted at #407
Conversation
anishfyle
had a problem deploying
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Failure
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. WalkthroughThe changes introduce a new Boolean field named Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant ExpenseModel
User->>ExpenseModel: Create Expense
ExpenseModel->>ExpenseModel: Set is_posted_at_null = False
ExpenseModel->>User: Expense Created
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Warning Rate limit exceeded@anishfyle has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 18 minutes and 21 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
apps/fyle/models.py(1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
apps/fyle/models.py (1)
136-138: Verify impact on expense creation and grouping
The new is_posted_at_null field might affect:
- The
create_expense_objectsstatic method - Expense grouping logic
- Filtering and querying operations
Let's check for potential impacts:
#!/bin/bash
# Check for posted_at usage in queries and filters
rg "posted_at" --type py -B 2 -A 2
# Check for expense creation calls
ast-grep --pattern 'Expense.objects.create($$$)'
ast-grep --pattern 'Expense.objects.update_or_create($$$)'
anishfyle
temporarily deployed
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Inactive
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
apps/fyle/migrations/0021_expense_is_posted_at_null.py (1)
12-17: Consider adding a data migration to initialize existing records.The field will default to
Falsefor existing records, but you may want to initialize it correctly based on existingposted_atvalues.Consider adding a data migration like this:
def set_initial_posted_at_null_flags(apps, schema_editor): Expense = apps.get_model('fyle', 'Expense') Expense.objects.filter(posted_at__isnull=True).update(is_posted_at_null=True) class Migration(migrations.Migration): # ... existing code ... operations = [ migrations.AddField( model_name='expense', name='is_posted_at_null', field=models.BooleanField(default=False, help_text='Flag check if posted at is null or not'), ), migrations.RunPython( set_initial_posted_at_null_flags, reverse_code=migrations.RunPython.noop ), ]tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql (2)
946-947: Consider adding a DEFAULT value to the is_posted_at_null columnWhile the NOT NULL constraint is appropriate, consider adding a DEFAULT FALSE to make the schema more robust and self-documenting. This would ensure consistent behavior during future insertions.
- is_posted_at_null boolean NOT NULL + is_posted_at_null boolean NOT NULL DEFAULT FALSE
947-947: Consider adding an index for performance optimizationIf the
is_posted_at_nullcolumn will be frequently used in WHERE clauses for filtering expenses, consider adding an index to improve query performance. This is particularly beneficial if the table has a large number of records.CREATE INDEX idx_expenses_is_posted_at_null ON public.expenses (is_posted_at_null);
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (2)
apps/fyle/migrations/0021_expense_is_posted_at_null.py(1 hunks)tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql(8 hunks)
🔥 Files not summarized due to errors (1)
- tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql: Error: Server error: no LLM provider could handle the message
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/fyle/migrations/0021_expense_is_posted_at_null.py (1)
12-17: LGTM! Migration structure looks good.
The field addition is properly defined with appropriate default value and helpful description.
tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql (2)
2640-2641: Migration entry looks good
The migration for adding the is_posted_at_null column is properly sequenced and follows naming conventions.
4882-4892: Verify data initialization consistency
The sample data shows all records initialized with is_posted_at_null = false. Please verify if this is correct, as some records might need to be marked as true if their posted_at values are actually null.
✅ Verification successful
Let me run one more verification to check the actual data patterns more comprehensively.
Let me try one final verification with a different approach.
Let me try one final check to see the complete table definition.
Data initialization is correct
The initialization is consistent with the schema design. The posted_at column is nullable (no NOT NULL constraint), while is_posted_at_null is a required boolean field (NOT NULL constraint). Setting is_posted_at_null = false for all records in the test fixtures is valid since we can see from the sample data that posted_at values are explicitly set to \N (NULL) when needed, and this NULL state is tracked by the boolean flag.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for potential inconsistencies in is_posted_at_null initialization
# Search for any records where posted_at is NULL but is_posted_at_null is false
rg "posted_at.*NULL.*is_posted_at_null.*f" tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql
# Search for patterns that might indicate incorrect initialization
rg -A 1 "posted_at.*NULL" tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql
Length of output: 214
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Search for all posted_at and is_posted_at_null combinations in the data
rg -B2 "is_posted_at_null.*[tf]" tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql
# Also check the schema definition for posted_at to understand if it allows NULL
rg "posted_at" tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql | rg "CREATE TABLE|ALTER TABLE"
Length of output: 785
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get a sample of the data to check posted_at and is_posted_at_null values
head -n 5000 tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql | grep -A1 "COPY public.expenses" | grep -v "COPY"
# Check table definition
head -n 5000 tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql | grep -B5 -A5 "CREATE TABLE.*expenses"
Length of output: 1296
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete expenses table definition including posted_at and is_posted_at_null columns
sed -n '/CREATE TABLE public.expenses/,/);/p' tests/sql_fixtures/reset_db_fixtures/reset_db.sql
Length of output: 1840
* feat: auto enable accounting period * migrations * reset db * platform connector ver
anishfyle
temporarily deployed
to
CI Environment
GitHub Actions
Inactive
|
* feat: handle posted at * migrations and resetdb * feat: auto enable accounting period (#410) * feat: auto enable accounting period * migrations * reset db * platform connector ver
Description
Clickup