Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revert "New master+wip" #85

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 6, 2020
Merged

Revert "New master+wip" #85

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 6, 2020

Conversation

litghost
Copy link

@litghost litghost commented Jul 6, 2020

Reverts #81

@litghost litghost requested a review from acomodi July 6, 2020 19:46
@litghost
Copy link
Author

litghost commented Jul 6, 2020

Restores version of master+wip with green Travis CI.

Copy link

@acomodi acomodi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@litghost All right, I will prepare a new master+wip so that Travis goes green. To do so we might have to disable one of the tests as it is related to having the RAMD32X1D disabled:

ERROR: Assertion failed: selection contains 0 elements instead of the asserted 8: t:RAM32X1D

@litghost
Copy link
Author

litghost commented Jul 6, 2020

@litghost All right, I will prepare a new master+wip so that Travis goes green. To do so we might have to disable one of the tests as it is related to having the RAMD32X1D disabled:

ERROR: Assertion failed: selection contains 0 elements instead of the asserted 8: t:RAM32X1D

Ya, that's what I've been working on. Hopefully I'll have an updated version today.

@litghost litghost merged commit 1a77013 into master+wip Jul 6, 2020
@litghost
Copy link
Author

litghost commented Jul 6, 2020

@acomodi I believe #87 will go green on travis.

@litghost litghost deleted the revert-81-new-master+wip branch November 20, 2020 21:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants