Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Stretch robot and mobile manipulation planning #291

Open
wants to merge 9 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

carlosquinterop
Copy link
Contributor

  • Creates a convenience class for the Stretch robot/planning and two test scripts.
  • Adds functions to the robot class to enable mobile manipulation planning. This feature relies on the existence of a kinematics solver plugin called base_manipulator_kinematics_plugin. See here.

Copy link
Contributor

@ChamzasKonstantinos ChamzasKonstantinos left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This implementation depends on a custom version of Moveit, that modifies the PlanarJoint.
We cannot merge it as it is now, since it breaks the code here: https://github.com/KavrakiLab/robowflex/runs/7571963014?check_suite_focus=true#step:3:2993

Maybe, remove the diff-drive feature? or make it dependent on a specific version of Moveit?

@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@ bool Robot::loadKinematics(const std::string &group_name, bool load_subgroups)
std::find(groups.begin(), groups.end(), name) == groups.end())
{
RBX_ERROR("No JMG or Kinematics defined for `%s`!", name);
return false;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will this not create a problem?

scchow added a commit to scchow/robowflex that referenced this pull request May 5, 2023
- Based on PR: KavrakiLab#291
- Incorporating functions necessary to do mobile base + manipulator
  planning with robowflex.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants