Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[WIP] Addition of
UnitOperationWarning
andstrict
kwarg toUnitRegistry
#166base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[WIP] Addition of
UnitOperationWarning
andstrict
kwarg toUnitRegistry
#166Changes from 9 commits
7a1553f
fb05c4d
152ba95
b433c19
ed298ad
b19e139
7230006
04e48f7
05f0763
d64b089
0d0bf7d
be41182
e5b139a
0943e71
b15d0ad
2533b4f
d3436be
f87b4bf
8f20ac7
75e89d3
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am hesitant about how this function implements the proposed functionality. Specifically, it feels weird to replace a raise statement with a return statement (where this function is used).
Another comment is that the
func
argument is redundant (I think), since it can be obtained asfunc = ufunc.method
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I share this uneasiness but I'm not sure of a better solution. It seems clear to me that some users will want this to fail explicitly and raise, whereas others will just want the warning, so there has to be a conditional somewhere that switches between that behaviour?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
To your second comment, makes sense, I'll remove the
func
argument.