Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

T5169: Add smoketest for CGNAT #3479

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2024
Merged

T5169: Add smoketest for CGNAT #3479

merged 1 commit into from
May 18, 2024

Conversation

sever-sever
Copy link
Member

Change Summary

Add smoketest for CGNAT

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Code style update (formatting, renaming)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes)
  • Migration from an old Vyatta component to vyos-1x, please link to related PR inside obsoleted component
  • Other (please describe): Smoketest

Related Task(s)

Related PR(s)

Component(s) name

cgnat

Proposed changes

How to test

Smoketest result

vyos@r4:~$ /usr/libexec/vyos/tests/smoke/cli/test_cgnat.py
test_cgnat (__main__.TestCGNAT.test_cgnat) ... ok

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Ran 1 test in 18.632s

OK
vyos@r4:~$ 

Checklist:

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING document
  • I have linked this PR to one or more Phabricator Task(s)
  • I have run the components SMOKETESTS if applicable
  • My commit headlines contain a valid Task id
  • My change requires a change to the documentation
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly

@sever-sever sever-sever requested review from a team, dmbaturin, sarthurdev, zdc, jestabro and c-po and removed request for a team May 17, 2024 14:07
@sever-sever sever-sever changed the title T5169: Add smoketeset for CGNAT T5169: Add smoketest for CGNAT May 17, 2024
@dmbaturin dmbaturin merged commit 9a58976 into vyos:current May 18, 2024
6 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants