Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix mesh name used to cache global node ids #20079

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: 3.4RC
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

markcmiller86
Copy link
Member

Description

I discovered a minor issue (for a rare case) while investigating #19130. The name of the mesh used to cache global node ids was incorrect. It doesn't match the name used for caching of other auxiliary data used in the same function. That said, this issue has nothing to do with #19130

  • Bug fix~~
  • New feature~~
  • Documentation update~~
  • Other~~

How Has This Been Tested?

Reminders:

  • Please follow the style guidelines of this project.
  • Please perform a self-review of your code before submitting a PR and asking others to review it.
  • Please assign reviewers (see VisIt's PR procedures for more information).

Checklist:

  • I have commented my code where applicable.~~
  • [ ] I have updated the release notes.
  • [ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation.
  • [ ] I have added debugging support to my changes.
  • [ ] I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works.
  • [ ] I have confirmed new and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes.
  • [ ] I have added new baselines for any new tests to the repo.
  • I have NOT made any changes to protocol or public interfaces in an RC branch.~~

@markcmiller86 markcmiller86 changed the title fFx mesh name used to cache global node ids fix mesh name used to cache global node ids Nov 23, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants