Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Improve the command for printing completion scripts #1998

Open
wants to merge 15 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from 10 commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
35 changes: 0 additions & 35 deletions autocomplete/bash_autocomplete

This file was deleted.

9 changes: 0 additions & 9 deletions autocomplete/powershell_autocomplete.ps1

This file was deleted.

30 changes: 0 additions & 30 deletions autocomplete/zsh_autocomplete

This file was deleted.

2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion command.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -257,7 +257,7 @@ func (cmd *Command) setupDefaults(osArgs []string) {
}

if cmd.EnableShellCompletion || cmd.Root().shellCompletion {
completionCommand := buildCompletionCommand()
completionCommand := buildCompletionCommand(cmd.Name)
bartekpacia marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

if cmd.ShellCompletionCommandName != "" {
tracef(
Expand Down
152 changes: 119 additions & 33 deletions completion.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2,49 +2,46 @@ package cli

import (
"context"
"embed"
"fmt"
"sort"
)

const (
completionCommandName = "generate-completion"
completionFlagName = "generate-shell-completion"
completionFlag = "--" + completionFlagName
)

var (
//go:embed autocomplete
autoCompleteFS embed.FS
completionCommandName = "completion"

shellCompletions = map[string]renderCompletion{
"bash": getCompletion("autocomplete/bash_autocomplete"),
"ps": getCompletion("autocomplete/powershell_autocomplete.ps1"),
"zsh": getCompletion("autocomplete/zsh_autocomplete"),
"fish": func(c *Command) (string, error) {
return c.ToFishCompletion()
},
}
// This flag is supposed to only be used by the completion script itself to generate completions on the fly.
completionFlagName = "generate-shell-completion"
completionFlag = "--" + completionFlagName
)

type renderCompletion func(*Command) (string, error)

func getCompletion(s string) renderCompletion {
return func(c *Command) (string, error) {
b, err := autoCompleteFS.ReadFile(s)
return string(b), err
}
var shellCompletions = map[string]renderCompletionFunc{
"bash": func(cmd *Command, appName string) (string, error) {
return genBashCompletion(appName), nil
},
"zsh": func(cmd *Command, appName string) (string, error) {
return genZshCompletion(appName), nil
},
"fish": func(c *Command, appName string) (string, error) {
return c.ToFishCompletion()
},
"pwsh": func(cmd *Command, appName string) (string, error) {
return genPwshCompletion(), nil
},
}

func buildCompletionCommand() *Command {
type renderCompletionFunc func(cmd *Command, appName string) (string, error)

func buildCompletionCommand(appName string) *Command {
return &Command{
Name: completionCommandName,
Hidden: true,
Action: completionCommandAction,
Action: func(ctx context.Context, cmd *Command) error {
return printShellCompletion(ctx, cmd, appName)
},
}
}

func completionCommandAction(ctx context.Context, cmd *Command) error {
func printShellCompletion(_ context.Context, cmd *Command, appName string) error {
var shells []string
for k := range shellCompletions {
shells = append(shells, k)
Expand All @@ -57,14 +54,103 @@ func completionCommandAction(ctx context.Context, cmd *Command) error {
}
s := cmd.Args().First()

if rc, ok := shellCompletions[s]; !ok {
renderCompletion, ok := shellCompletions[s]
if !ok {
return Exit(fmt.Sprintf("unknown shell %s, available shells are %+v", s, shells), 1)
} else if c, err := rc(cmd); err != nil {
}

completionScript, err := renderCompletion(cmd, appName)
if err != nil {
return Exit(err, 1)
}

_, err = cmd.Writer.Write([]byte(completionScript))
if err != nil {
return Exit(err, 1)
} else {
if _, err = cmd.Writer.Write([]byte(c)); err != nil {
return Exit(err, 1)
}
}

return nil
}

func genBashCompletion(appName string) string {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you provide the reason why you moved away from embedFs to having the completion inline with the code ? In the previous approach it was very easy to lookup where the autcompletes were and what they were doing

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is to make it easier to use %[1]s since then declaration and usage is in the same place.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure about this either. We get nice syntax highlighting from the code editor/IDE when the autocomplete is in a separate file. But when it's inlined, it's treated as a string, which makes it less readable.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wouldn't say it's a big problem. Characters like %[1] aren't valid shell function names anyway and will probably be highlighted wrongly.

I also think keeping everything related to completion in a single file is quote convenient.

Copy link
Contributor

@abitrolly abitrolly Nov 10, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I also think keeping everything related to completion in a single file is quote convenient.

Scrolling back and forth between template and its code doesn't seem convenient to me. It is better to have two panes - one with template and another with source code that prepares data for it.

Highlighting of template variables as errors could actually be a feature.

return fmt.Sprintf(`#!/usr/env/bin bash

# This is a shell completion script auto-generated by https://github.com/urfave/cli for bash.

# Macs have bash3 for which the bash-completion package doesn't include
# _init_completion. This is a minimal version of that function.
_cli_init_completion() {
COMPREPLY=()
_get_comp_words_by_ref "$@" cur prev words cword
}

_cli_bash_autocomplete() {
if [[ "${COMP_WORDS[0]}" != "source" ]]; then
local cur opts base words
COMPREPLY=()
cur="${COMP_WORDS[COMP_CWORD]}"
if declare -F _init_completion >/dev/null 2>&1; then
_init_completion -n "=:" || return
else
_cli_init_completion -n "=:" || return
fi
words=("${words[@]:0:$cword}")
if [[ "$cur" == "-"* ]]; then
requestComp="${words[*]} ${cur} --generate-shell-completion"
else
requestComp="${words[*]} --generate-shell-completion"
fi
opts=$(eval "${requestComp}" 2>/dev/null)
COMPREPLY=($(compgen -W "${opts}" -- ${cur}))
return 0
fi
}

complete -o bashdefault -o default -o nospace -F _cli_bash_autocomplete %[1]s
`, appName)
}

func genZshCompletion(appName string) string {
return fmt.Sprintf(`#compdef %[1]s
compdef _%[1]s %[1]s

# This is a shell completion script auto-generated by https://github.com/urfave/cli for zsh.

_%[1]s() {
local -a opts # Declare a local array
local current
current=${words[-1]} # -1 means "the last element"
if [[ "$current" == "-"* ]]; then
# Current word starts with a hyphen, so complete flags/options
opts=("${(@f)$(${words[@]:0:#words[@]-1} ${current} --generate-shell-completion)}")
else
# Current word does not start with a hyphen, so complete subcommands
opts=("${(@f)$(${words[@]:0:#words[@]-1} --generate-shell-completion)}")
fi

if [[ "${opts[1]}" != "" ]]; then
_describe 'values' opts
else
_files
fi
}

# Don't run the completion function when being source-ed or eval-ed.
# See https://github.com/urfave/cli/issues/1874 for discussion.
if [ "$funcstack[1]" = "_%[1]s" ]; then
_%[1]s
fi
`, appName)
}

func genPwshCompletion() string {
return `$fn = $($MyInvocation.MyCommand.Name)
$name = $fn -replace "(.*)\.ps1$", '$1'
Register-ArgumentCompleter -Native -CommandName $name -ScriptBlock {
param($commandName, $wordToComplete, $cursorPosition)
$other = "$wordToComplete --generate-shell-completion"
Invoke-Expression $other | ForEach-Object {
[System.Management.Automation.CompletionResult]::new($_, $_, 'ParameterValue', $_)
}
}`
}
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion completion_test.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -200,7 +200,7 @@ func TestCompletionInvalidShell(t *testing.T) {
assert.ErrorContains(t, err, "unknown shell junky-sheell")

enableError := true
shellCompletions[unknownShellName] = func(c *Command) (string, error) {
shellCompletions[unknownShellName] = func(c *Command, appName string) (string, error) {
if enableError {
return "", fmt.Errorf("cant do completion")
}
Expand Down
70 changes: 70 additions & 0 deletions examples/simpletask/main.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
package main
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I dont see the value of this example. Its not really doing anything. If you want to really test this move it into examples_test.go or call it func ExampleCompletion(...) in completion_test.go

Copy link
Member Author

@bartekpacia bartekpacia Nov 5, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi, I do see its value, it's a simple yet quite realistic CLI app. It's quite useful for testing shell completions, because it has a few subcommand and sets EnableShellCompletion: true.

Maybe I can modify example-cli or example-hello-world and add a few subcommand and EnableShellCompletion: true there?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I find complete examples very useful. Sometimes you just need a bit of working code to debug something that doesn't work anymore. If completions break when migrating from v2 to v3, then using this v3 code as a reference, I could find the cause much faster.

Complete working examples are also useful for training AI.

It needs some better organization, though. Maybe even numbers to sort contents in the order people usually learn the library. By most frequent use cases.

https://github.com/urfave/cli/tree/ef45965eeb9c1122885fafa4a391b6be6a674f3d/examples

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, the main reason why I put this sample in a new file is because examples_test is not easily runnable.

I agree with @abitrolly comment that it's be nice to have a single place for more "full app" examples.


import (
"context"
"fmt"
"log"
"os"

"github.com/urfave/cli/v3"
)

func main() {
app := &cli.Command{
Name: "simpletask",
Usage: "a dead simple task manager",
EnableShellCompletion: true,
Action: func(ctx context.Context, command *cli.Command) error {
fmt.Println("decide what to do!")
return nil
},
Commands: []*cli.Command{
{
Name: "add",
Aliases: []string{"a"},
Usage: "add a task to the list",
Action: func(ctx context.Context, cmd *cli.Command) error {
fmt.Println("added task: ", cmd.Args().First())
return nil
},
},
{
Name: "complete",
Aliases: []string{"c"},
Usage: "complete a task on the list",
Action: func(ctx context.Context, cmd *cli.Command) error {
fmt.Println("completed task: ", cmd.Args().First())
return nil
},
},
{
Name: "template",
Aliases: []string{"t"},
Usage: "options for task templates",
Commands: []*cli.Command{
{
Name: "add",
Usage: "add a new template",
Action: func(ctx context.Context, cmd *cli.Command) error {
fmt.Println("new task template: ", cmd.Args().First())
return nil
},
},
{
Name: "remove",
Usage: "remove an existing template",
Action: func(ctx context.Context, cmd *cli.Command) error {
fmt.Println("removed task template: ", cmd.Args().First())
return nil
},
},
},
},
},
}

err := app.Run(context.Background(), os.Args)
if err != nil {
log.Fatal(err)
}
}
7 changes: 4 additions & 3 deletions help.go
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -190,8 +190,9 @@ func cliArgContains(flagName string, args []string) bool {
}

func printFlagSuggestions(lastArg string, flags []Flag, writer io.Writer) {
cur := strings.TrimPrefix(lastArg, "-")
cur = strings.TrimPrefix(cur, "-")
// Trim the prefix twice to handle both "-short" and "--long" flags.
currentArg := strings.TrimPrefix(lastArg, "-")
currentArg = strings.TrimPrefix(currentArg, "-")
for _, flag := range flags {
if bflag, ok := flag.(*BoolFlag); ok && bflag.Hidden {
continue
Expand All @@ -214,7 +215,7 @@ func printFlagSuggestions(lastArg string, flags []Flag, writer io.Writer) {
continue
}
// match if last argument matches this flag and it is not repeated
if strings.HasPrefix(name, cur) && cur != name && !cliArgContains(name, os.Args) {
if strings.HasPrefix(name, currentArg) && currentArg != name && !cliArgContains(name, os.Args) {
flagCompletion := fmt.Sprintf("%s%s", strings.Repeat("-", count), name)
if usage != "" && strings.HasSuffix(os.Getenv("SHELL"), "zsh") {
flagCompletion = fmt.Sprintf("%s:%s", flagCompletion, usage)
Expand Down
Loading