-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
get workspace state #15
Conversation
Warning Rate limit exceeded@italopessoa has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 28 minutes and 49 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes modify the GitHub Actions workflow in the Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant GitHub Actions
participant Terraform Cloud
participant Workflow
GitHub Actions->>Terraform Cloud: Retrieve outputs from workspace
Terraform Cloud-->>GitHub Actions: Return output JSON
GitHub Actions->>Workflow: Echo latest run status
GitHub Actions->>Workflow: Process output JSON
Workflow-->>GitHub Actions: Extract vpc_id
GitHub Actions->>Workflow: Echo vpc_id
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/terraform.yaml (1)
173-178
: Consider removing the duplicate step.The step is correctly using
jq
to extract thevpc_id
value from the output JSON. However, it's essentially a duplicate of the previous step, with a minor difference in the variable name.Consider removing this step to keep the workflow concise and maintainable.
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/terraform.yaml (1 hunks)
Additional context used
actionlint
.github/workflows/terraform.yaml
164-164: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2140:warning:1:27: Word is of the form "A"B"C" (B indicated). Did you mean "ABC" or "A"B"C"?
(shellcheck)
Additional comments not posted (3)
.github/workflows/terraform.yaml (3)
156-160
: LGTM!The step is correctly using the
hashicorp/tfc-workflows-github/actions/workspace-output
action to retrieve outputs from the specified Terraform Cloud workspace.
162-165
: LGTM!The step is correctly echoing the latest run status using the
steps.output.outputs.outputs
context.Regarding the shellcheck warning, it can be safely ignored as the double quotes are correctly used to wrap the variable expansion.
Tools
actionlint
164-164: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2140:warning:1:27: Word is of the form "A"B"C" (B indicated). Did you mean "ABC" or "A"B"C"?
(shellcheck)
167-171
: LGTM!The step is correctly using
jq
to extract thevpc_id
value from the output JSON.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/terraform.yaml (4 hunks)
Additional context used
actionlint
.github/workflows/terraform.yaml
170-170: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2140:warning:1:27: Word is of the form "A"B"C" (B indicated). Did you mean "ABC" or "A"B"C"?
(shellcheck)
187-187: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2140:warning:1:10: Word is of the form "A"B"C" (B indicated). Did you mean "ABC" or "A"B"C"?
(shellcheck)
187-187: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2140:warning:1:18: Word is of the form "A"B"C" (B indicated). Did you mean "ABC" or "A"B"C"?
(shellcheck)
Additional comments not posted (1)
.github/workflows/terraform.yaml (1)
162-177
: LGTM!The step correctly retrieves outputs from the specified Terraform Cloud workspace using the
hashicorp/tfc-workflows-github/actions/workspace-output
action. The subsequent steps echo the retrieved outputs and extract thevpc_id
value usingjq
, which is a valid approach.Tools
actionlint
170-170: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2140:warning:1:27: Word is of the form "A"B"C" (B indicated). Did you mean "ABC" or "A"B"C"?
(shellcheck)
.github/workflows/terraform.yaml
Outdated
- name: "v3" | ||
continue-on-error: true | ||
run: | | ||
vpc_id2=$(echo ${{ toJson(steps.output.outputs.outputs) }} | jq -r '.[] | select(.name == "vpc_id") | .value') | ||
echo "$vpc_id2" | ||
|
||
- name: "v4" | ||
continue-on-error: true | ||
run: | | ||
echo "{ "name": "John" }" | jq -r '.[] | select(.name == "John") | .name' | ||
|
||
|
||
- name: "v5" | ||
continue-on-error: true | ||
run: | | ||
echo ${{ toJson(steps.output.outputs.outputs) }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review of the additional output processing steps:
-
The "v3" step correctly uses
toJson
to convert the outputs to JSON format before usingjq
to extract thevpc_id
value. This is a valid approach. -
The "v4" step seems to be a demonstration or test case and may not be directly related to the workflow functionality. Consider removing this step if it's not necessary.
-
The "v5" step echoes the JSON representation of the retrieved outputs, which can be useful for debugging.
-
The static analysis hints suggest potential issues with the usage of double quotes in the "v4" step. To address this, consider using single quotes or escaping the double quotes to avoid word splitting. Here's an example:
- echo "{ "name": "John" }" | jq -r '.[] | select(.name == "John") | .name'
+ echo '{ "name": "John" }' | jq -r '.[] | select(.name == "John") | .name'
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
- name: "v3" | |
continue-on-error: true | |
run: | | |
vpc_id2=$(echo ${{ toJson(steps.output.outputs.outputs) }} | jq -r '.[] | select(.name == "vpc_id") | .value') | |
echo "$vpc_id2" | |
- name: "v4" | |
continue-on-error: true | |
run: | | |
echo "{ "name": "John" }" | jq -r '.[] | select(.name == "John") | .name' | |
- name: "v5" | |
continue-on-error: true | |
run: | | |
echo ${{ toJson(steps.output.outputs.outputs) }} | |
- name: "v3" | |
continue-on-error: true | |
run: | | |
vpc_id2=$(echo ${{ toJson(steps.output.outputs.outputs) }} | jq -r '.[] | select(.name == "vpc_id") | .value') | |
echo "$vpc_id2" | |
- name: "v4" | |
continue-on-error: true | |
run: | | |
echo '{ "name": "John" }' | jq -r '.[] | select(.name == "John") | .name' | |
- name: "v5" | |
continue-on-error: true | |
run: | | |
echo ${{ toJson(steps.output.outputs.outputs) }} |
Tools
actionlint
187-187: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2140:warning:1:10: Word is of the form "A"B"C" (B indicated). Did you mean "ABC" or "A"B"C"?
(shellcheck)
187-187: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2140:warning:1:18: Word is of the form "A"B"C" (B indicated). Did you mean "ABC" or "A"B"C"?
(shellcheck)
…b.database into italopessoa-patch-1
Quality Gate passedIssues Measures |
Terraform Cloud Plan Output
|
No description provided.