- Fork, clone.
- Run
bundle install
in console. If it says something like "I don't know how to run bundle",gem install bundler
should help. Then anyway runbundle install
. - Run
rake
. It basically runs all the tests in the homework. - To run a single test you still can execute
ruby test/some_test.rb
- Code you need to tweak is in
main
directory.
A palindrome is a word or phrase that reads the same forwards as backwards, ignoring case, punctuation, and nonword characters. (A "nonword character" is defined for our purposes as "a character that Ruby regular expressions would treat as a nonword character".)
You will write a method palindrome?
in module Palindrome
that
returns true if and only if its receiver is a palindrome.
Palindrome.palindrome?("redivider") # => should return true
Palindrome.palindrome?("adam") # => should return false or nil
What may help: String#gsub
, String#reverse
, String#downcase
. Check
it out on ruby-doc.org.
Define a function count
in module Words
that, given an input string,
return a hash whose keys are words in the string and whose values are
the number of times each word appears:
Words.count("To be or not to be") # => {"to"=>2, "be"=>2, "or"=>1, "not"=>1}
Your solution shouldn't use for-loops, but iterators like each
are
permitted. As before, nonwords and case should be ignored. A word is
defined as a string of characters between word boundaries.
What may help: String#gsub
, String#split
, String#downcase
,
Enumerable#group_by
. Check it out on ruby-doc.org.
An anagram group is a group of words such that any one can be converted into any other just by rearranging the letters. For example, "rats", "tars" and "star" are an anagram group.
Given a space separated list of words in a single string, write a method that groups them into anagram groups and returns the array of groups. Case doesn't matter in classifying string as anagrams (but case should be preserved in the output), and the order of the anagrams in the groups doesn't matter.
anagrams("rats What star thaw Tars") # => should return [["rats", "star", "Tars"], ["What", "Thaw"]]
# arrays or item in arrays may come in any order
In a game of rock-paper-scissors, each player chooses to play Rock (R), Paper (P), or Scissors (S). The rules are: Rock breaks Scissors, Scissors cuts Paper, but Paper covers Rock.
In a round of rock-paper-scissors, each player's name and strategy is encoded as an array of two elements
[ ["Joker", "P"], ["Batman", "S"] ] # Batman would win since S > P
Create a RockPaperScissors
class with a class method winner that takes
two 2-element arrays like those above, and returns the one representing
the winner:
RockPaperScissors.winner(['Joker','P'], ['Batman','S']) # => ['Batman','S']
If either player's strategy is something other than "R", "P" or "S"
(case-SENSITIVE), the method should raise a
RockPaperScissors::NoSuchStrategyError
exception, and provide the
message: "Strategy must be one of R,P,S".
If both players use the same strategy, the first player is the winner.
A rock-paper-scissors tournament is encoded as an array of games - that is, each element can be considered its own tournament.
[
[
[ ["Ivy", "P"], ["Copperhead", "S"] ],
[ ["Batman", "R"], ["Joker", "S"] ],
],
[
[ ["Catwoman", "S"], ["Two-Face", "P"] ],
[ ["Penguin", "R"], ["Riddler", "P"] ]
]
]
In the tournament above Ivy will always play P and Dave will always play S. This tournament plays out as follows:
Under this scenario, Copperhead would beat Ivy (S>P) and Batman would beat Joker (R>S), so Copperhead and Batman would play (Batman wins since R>S); similarly, Catwoman would beat Two-Face, Riddler would beat Penguin, and Catwoman and Riddler would play (Catwoman wins since S>P); and finally Batman would beat Catwoman since R>S. That is, pairwise play continues until there is only a single winner.
Write a method RockPaperScissors.tournament_winner' that takes a tournament encoded as an array and returns the winner (for the above example, it should return
['Batman', 'R']`). You can assume that the
array is well formed (that is, there are 2^n players, and each one
participates in exactly one match per round).
HINT: Formulate the problem as a recursive one whose base case you solved in part 1.
We saw how attr_accessor uses metaprogramming to create getters and setters for object attributes on the fly.
Define a method attr_accessor_with_history that provides the same functionality as attr_accessor but also tracks every value the attribute has ever had:
class Foo
attr_accessor_with_history :bar
end
f = Foo.new
f.bar = 3 # => 3
f.bar = :wowzo # => :wowzo
f.bar = 'boo!' # => 'boo!'
f.bar_history # => [nil, 3, :wowzo]
# (Calling bar_history before bar's setter is ever called should return nil.)
History of instance variables should be maintained separately for each object instance. that is:
f = Foo.new
f.bar = 1 ; f.bar = 2
g = Foo.new
g.bar = 3 ; g.bar = 4
g.bar_history
then the last line should just return [nil,3], rather than [nil,1,3].
If you're interested in how the template works, the first thing to
notice is that if we define attr_accessor_with_history
in class
Class
, we can use it as in the snippet above. This is because a Ruby
class like Foo
or String
is actually just an object of class
Class
. (If that makes your brain hurt, just don't worry about it for
now. It'll come.)
The second thing to notice is that Ruby provides a method class_eval
that takes a string and evaluates it in the context of the current
class, that is, the class from which you're calling
attr_accessor_with_history
. This string will need to contain a method
definition that implements a setter-with-history for the desired
attribute attr_name.
HINTS:
- Don't forget that the very first time the attribute receives a value, its history array will have to be initialized.
- If
foo_history
is referenced before foo has ever been assigned, the correct answer is[]
, but after the first assignment to foo, the correct value forfoo_history
would be[nil]
. - Don't forget that instance variables are referred to as
@bar
within getters and setters. Although the existing attr_accessor can handle multiple arguments (e.g.attr_accessor :foo, :bar
), your version just needs to handle a single argument. Your implementation should be general enough to work in the context of any class and for attributes of any (legal) variable name.