RNP 0.10.0 release / introductory post #10
Conversation
| corrected compatibility issues with GnuPG and other implementations, | ||
| improved performance and added cutting-edge features. | ||
|
|
||
| Feel free to use RNP in your software! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This line feels a little out of place. I'm thinking it could be reworded to include mention of the BSD licensing though maybe?
|
@dewyatt The call to action will likely be rephrased before the post is published, good point about the license. I’d like your input on some other matter too, namely a quick Ruby bindings getting-started summary and whether the mention of ctypes would be technically correct in the post. |
That looks mostly valid at a glance as a pk-encrypt+decrypt example. Generally the ruby-rnp examples directory is the best source (other than the one broken example as noted in an issue). There's also symmetric/password-based encryption+decryption, signing+verifying, etc.
Yes, it's correct. |
|
@dewyatt I looked through ruby-rnp examples before. What I’m looking for is a really minimal (but complete) sample snippet, just a few lines suitable for a post. Couldn’t quickly piece one together based on those examples, but I’ll give it another shot. |
|
Should not we finish this and merge? Site looks quite empty. |
|
@ni4 If someone’s willing to take this on right now, please feel free! |
|
This post has already been merged in 51d8956, closing. Thanks @strogonoff ! |
Please don’t merge. :) This is just to collect feedback before it’s polished and published. If this way of collecting feedback doesn’t work for you, please let me know.