-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 37
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Modify the block template download method to pnpm, modify the block release environment variables #14
Conversation
Signed-off-by: lu17301156525 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: lu17301156525 <[email protected]>
This reverts commit 3006756.
Signed-off-by: lu17301156525 <[email protected]>
WalkthroughThe pull request introduces modifications across three files related to npm registry configuration and package management. In Changes
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
app/service/cnpm.ts (1)
21-23
: Overall assessment of changes tologinInNpm
methodThe modifications to the npm configuration commands in the
loginInNpm
method introduce some improvements, particularly the addition of user verification. However, the changes also make assumptions about the format ofthis.registry
that could potentially lead to issues.To ensure robustness:
- Verify the format of
this.registry
throughout the application.- Consider implementing the suggested improvements to handle various formats of
this.registry
.- Add error handling to catch and log any issues that might occur during the npm configuration process.
These changes will help maintain the reliability of the npm login process across different environments and registry configurations.
app/service/material-center/vueBlockBuilder.ts (1)
Line range hint
16-57
: Summary of changes and potential impactThe changes in this file appear to be part of a larger shift in the project's package management strategy:
- The switch from
npmRegistryOptions
tocnpmRegistryOptions
suggests a change in the registry being used.- The adoption of
pnpm
instead ofnpm
for package installation indicates a change in the package manager.These changes, while beneficial in terms of efficiency and potentially solving specific issues, may have broader implications:
- Ensure all team members are aware of and equipped to work with the new package management setup.
- Update any documentation, README files, or contribution guidelines to reflect these changes.
- Review and update any CI/CD pipelines or scripts that may be affected by these changes.
- Consider creating a migration guide if these changes require actions from other developers or in other parts of the codebase.
Consider documenting the rationale behind these changes and any expected benefits or potential challenges in the project's documentation or wiki. This will help maintain institutional knowledge and assist future developers in understanding the project's evolution.
config/config.default.ts (3)
318-318
: LGTM: Registry configuration updated correctly.The
registry
configuration has been properly updated to use the complete URL 'https://registry.npmjs.org/'. This is a good practice and ensures consistency.Consider removing the comment about replacing with a private repository if it's not applicable to all deployments of this configuration. If it is generally applicable, consider making it more prominent, perhaps as a TODO or a configuration option.
Line range hint
307-314
: Consider adding logic to choose between registry options.The addition of
cnpmRegistryOptions
for a domestic npm mirror alongside the existingnpmRegistryOptions
provides good flexibility. However, it's not clear how the system decides which option to use.Consider adding logic to dynamically choose between
npmRegistryOptions
andcnpmRegistryOptions
based on the deployment environment or a configuration flag. This would make the system more adaptable to different scenarios without requiring code changes.
Line range hint
1-327
: Consider restructuring the configuration file for better organization.The configuration file contains a mix of different types of configurations (npm, git, AI models, etc.). While this is not incorrect, it could be improved for better readability and maintainability.
Consider restructuring the configuration file by:
- Grouping related configurations together (e.g., all npm-related configs in one section, all git-related configs in another).
- Using comments to clearly delineate different sections of the configuration.
- Potentially splitting very large configuration objects (like
aiChat
) into separate files and importing them.This restructuring would make the file easier to navigate and maintain as the project grows.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- app/service/cnpm.ts (2 hunks)
- app/service/material-center/vueBlockBuilder.ts (3 hunks)
- config/config.default.ts (2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (7)
app/service/cnpm.ts (2)
23-23
: Good addition of npm user verificationAdding the
npm whoami
command is a good practice to verify the successful login after setting the registry and token. This helps catch any potential authentication issues early.
21-21
: Verify the format ofthis.registry
The removal of 'https://' from the registry setting command suggests that
this.registry
now includes the protocol. Please ensure thatthis.registry
always includes the protocol (e.g., 'https://registry.npmjs.org') to avoid potential connection issues.To confirm the format of
this.registry
, you can run the following script:If
this.registry
doesn't always include the protocol, consider updating the command to:`npm config set registry ${this.registry.startsWith('http') ? this.registry : `https://${this.registry}`}`,app/service/material-center/vueBlockBuilder.ts (3)
16-16
: LGTM: Improved code formattingThe added space before the opening brace in the class declaration improves code formatting consistency and aligns with common JavaScript/TypeScript style guidelines.
48-48
: Verify the impact of changing registry optionsThe change from
npmRegistryOptions
tocnpmRegistryOptions
suggests a shift in the package manager or registry being used. Please ensure that:
- The
cnpmRegistryOptions
is properly defined and contains all necessary registry information.- This change is consistent with other parts of the codebase that might rely on registry options.
- The new options don't introduce any breaking changes in the build process.
To help verify this change, you can run the following script:
#!/bin/bash # Check for other occurrences of npmRegistryOptions and cnpmRegistryOptions echo "Occurrences of npmRegistryOptions:" rg --type typescript "npmRegistryOptions" echo "\nOccurrences of cnpmRegistryOptions:" rg --type typescript "cnpmRegistryOptions" # Check the structure of both options echo "\nStructure of npmRegistryOptions:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern '$_.$_.npmRegistryOptions' echo "\nStructure of cnpmRegistryOptions:" ast-grep --lang typescript --pattern '$_.$_.cnpmRegistryOptions'
57-57
: Approve change to pnpm, but verify consistencyThe switch from
npm
topnpm
for package installation is a good optimization. pnpm is known for its efficiency and disk space savings. However, please ensure that:
- This change is consistent across the entire project.
- All developers are aware of the switch to pnpm and have it installed.
- Any CI/CD pipelines or scripts that rely on npm commands are updated accordingly.
To help verify the consistency of this change, you can run the following script:
config/config.default.ts (2)
14-14
: LGTM: Import statement added correctly.The new import statement for
E_FOUNDATION_MODEL
andE_SchemaFormatFunc
is correctly added and these enums are used in the configuration, making this a necessary change.
311-314
: Improve documentation for the new configuration.While the new
cnpmRegistryOptions
configuration is correctly added, the comment "国内镜像" (domestic mirror) could be more descriptive. Consider adding a more detailed explanation of this configuration's purpose and usage.As suggested in a previous review, please add comprehensive documentation for this new configuration parameter. Also, check if the project's existing documentation needs to be updated to reflect this addition.
`npm config set //${this.registry}:_authToken=${this.authToken}`, | ||
`npm whoami --registry https://${this.registry}` | ||
`npm config set registry ${this.registry}`, | ||
`npm config set //${this.registry.split("//")?.[1]}:_authToken=${this.authToken}`, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Improve robustness of authentication token setting
The current implementation assumes this.registry
always includes a protocol. To make this more robust:
Consider updating the line to handle cases where this.registry
might not include a protocol:
`npm config set //${this.registry.includes('//') ? this.registry.split('//')[1] : this.registry}:_authToken=${this.authToken}`,
This change ensures the command works correctly regardless of whether this.registry
includes a protocol or not.
English | 简体中文
PR
PR Checklist
Please check if your PR fulfills the following requirements:
PR Type
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Background and solution
What is the current behavior?
Issue Number: N/A
What is the new behavior?
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Style