This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 16, 2024. It is now read-only.
Testing (and failing) #16
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
@Kevin-Mattheus-Moerman - I'm opening this PR up for some feedback. I've tried the suggestions you made in #14 (comment) but they don't seem to be working. In fact, whatever changes I make to any of the bibtex styles simply aren't reflected in the PDF output produced by this pandoc command: https://github.com/openjournals/whedon/blob/master/lib/whedon/processor.rb#L89-L117
I'm not sure if this is a pandoc issue or what but I don't seem to be able to get this working and would appreciate any thoughts/insights you might have here.