spec: Adjust selinux requirement for stable upstream releases

We make official upstream releases from packages built either in CBS or
COPR. Neither of these environments offers any of the upstream clones of
RHEL (AlmaLinux, Rocky Linux) as chroot environments - only CentOS
Stream is available. This fact, combined with how `%{?selinux_requires}`
macro works, makes our lives complicated.

As part of `selinux-policy` installation we get
a `/usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.selinux-policy` file that has among
others i.e.:

```
%_selinux_policy_version 36.14-1.fc36
...
%selinux_requires \
Requires: selinux-policy >= %{_selinux_policy_version} \
...
```

The `%_selinux_policy_version` expands to the version of the
`selinux-policy` package *that is installed in the environment where
the RPM is built*. On CentOS Stream these RPMs are usually slightly
ahead than their counterparts on the stable releases.
Since we only have CentOS Stream chroots available for building RPMs,
when we try to install such a package on a stable release, 'dnf'
resolves the conflicts by simply picking a package version that's old
enough to meet the 'selinux-policy' requirement.

Ideally, packages for stable releases should be built in chroots based
on stable releases. Since we don't have that option for now, let's define
the `%_selinux_policy_version` by ourselves to a value that matches
the version from the latest stable release.

Signed-off-by: Marcin Sobczyk <[email protected]>

ovirt-vmconsole.spec.in

@@ -24,6 +24,16 @@ BuildRequires:	openssh-server
 BuildRequires:	selinux-policy-devel
 BuildRequires:  selinux-policy
 BuildArch:	noarch
+
+# for upstream require the version from the latest stable release
+%if 0%{?centos} == 8
+%global _selinux_policy_version 3.14.3-95.el8_6.4
+%endif
+
+%if 0%{?centos} == 9
+%global _selinux_policy_version 34.1.29-1.el9_0.2
+%endif
+
 %{?selinux_requires}
 
 BuildRequires:	python3-devel