-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 47
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
config: add new dodo contracts #882
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🧰 Additional context used📓 Learnings (1)config/dexs.json (1)
🔇 Additional comments (7)config/dexs.json (7)
The new addresses are properly formatted and follow the existing pattern.
The new addresses are properly formatted and follow the existing pattern.
The new addresses are properly formatted and follow the existing pattern.
The addresses However, based on previous feedback from @0xDEnYO, this format is acceptable.
The new addresses are properly formatted and follow the existing pattern.
The addresses However, based on previous feedback from @0xDEnYO, this format is acceptable.
The test network configurations are properly separated and maintained. Also applies to: 836-836 Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 2
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
config/dexs.json (1)
841-841
: Format the JSON file properlyThe file ends with a newline after the closing brace. While this is generally good practice, ensure it's consistent with your project's formatting guidelines.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
config/dexs.json
(7 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
config/dexs.json (1)
46-47
: Verify if these addresses are valid DODO contracts
The PR title mentions adding new DODO contracts, but we should verify that these new addresses are indeed DODO-related contracts across different networks.
Also applies to: 157-158, 272-273, 531-531, 706-707, 749-750
Test Coverage ReportLine Coverage: 76.59% (1725 / 2252 lines) |
Which Jira task belongs to this PR?
https://lifi.atlassian.net/browse/LF-11216
Why did I implement it this way?
Here is the BE PR: https://github.com/lifinance/lifi-backend/pull/5897
But we first need to update SC
Checklist before requesting a review
Checklist for reviewer (DO NOT DEPLOY and contracts BEFORE CHECKING THIS!!!)