[Codegen][llvmgpu] Compute gemmC size when C promotion is done in padding matmul #19307
+555
−38
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR depends on #19271. Please review the last commit only.
The existing implementation of #19271 doesn't take gemmC into consideration when computing shared memory size. Though in condition of #19271, gemmC always get promoted and we ended always allocating the C tensor in shared memory. Ignoring C tensor will severely underestimate the amount of shared memory used and eventually cause
deduceMMASchedule()
to pick a tile size too large and go beyond the space limit for shared memory.6c9ffd2 addressed this by adding
calculateResultSharedMemoryUsedInBytes()
and apply it to matmul tiling size derive process.