Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Naming convention r_base::aggregate:: for aggregate functions, e.g. #95

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 22, 2024

Conversation

romainfrancois
Copy link
Collaborator

as discussed in #90

Copy link
Collaborator

@krlmlr krlmlr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks, I'd rather keep the name unchanged. From #90 (comment) it seems that we can handle the "aggregate" cases by surrounding them with expr_window() ?

@romainfrancois
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Thanks for the review. I'll revert to using r_base::sum etc ... here and then adjust tidyverse/duckplyr#171 accordingly with the alias etc ...

@romainfrancois romainfrancois merged commit 397ab2a into main May 22, 2024
46 of 50 checks passed
@romainfrancois romainfrancois deleted the aggregate branch May 22, 2024 11:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants