-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add cBioPortal page #83
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
looks great! I changed the colors and made some text edits. otherwise I think good to me!
Looks good to me. Quick question, for, " Is direct data contribution to cBioPortal feasible by the contributor?- Yes", not sure why we need "CONTRIBUTOR: Works directly with MSKCC on the submission process of data to cBioPortal". Maybe not for the workflow, but we should figure out how you will hand over the files to us. For Drapkin cohort, if I remember correctly, it was via synapse. Should we continue with that process? Datahub will not be an option as data is not public till phase 3 |
I think we are trying to say - "is the contributor savy enough to work on preparing the necessary files for cbioportal or does Sage need to step in to do this ? Correct? Perhaps rephrasing is needed: "Does the contributor have the expertise and resources to independently manage and prepare data submissions for cBioPortal, or is intervention from Sage required to facilitate this process? |
Following our discussion today: We want to better streamline this process and let's try to simplify the workflow so it doesn't have as many exchanges between the contributor, MSK, and Sage.
|
@ritikakundra @inodb @cconrad8 I simplified this a bit so MSKCC does even less (no path to work directly with contribs). Merging this version, make a PR or issue if we need to revisit later. |
See preview here 👉🏼 https://docs-git-feat-cbioportal-page-gf-dcc-service.vercel.app/docs/workflows/cBioPortal
@cconrad8 -- You can make any changes before adding Ino and Ritika to review. I prompted ChatGPT to simplify and create the rough diagram from original version, so there things to double-check. Restyling colors fine.