Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add Central v2024.2 upgrade instructions #1858

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Sep 30, 2024

Conversation

lognaturel
Copy link
Member

@lognaturel lognaturel commented Sep 25, 2024

See #1855

@matthew-white
Copy link
Member

Just wanted to check, is this PR ready for review / to be merged?

@lognaturel
Copy link
Member Author

We'll want to add a link to https://github.com/getodk/docs/pull/1859/files#diff-d1fd5d1b68bb4a3d5db94b2138eaf7ab19c8f8eeee5d9c69a6745a58d5e6eed1R330

Maybe you could plan on doing that after #1859 is merged either by pushing a commit here or doing another PR?

@lognaturel lognaturel marked this pull request as ready for review September 26, 2024 16:07
@lognaturel
Copy link
Member Author

I added the link because I realized I wanted to change some wording too. The build will be broken but I think we can squash and merge after #1859 and follow up if there are any issues on master.

Copy link
Member

@matthew-white matthew-white left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks great. 👍 Exciting to read about these improvements!

docs/central-upgrade.rst Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@matthew-white
Copy link
Member

Looking at the PR description and at edits to #1855, I'm realizing that you were probably using #1855 to prepare these docs. I actually intended that one to be the tracking issue for .3. I had a separate issue for .2 at #1786, but I moved some notes from #1786 to #1855 when it looked like they weren't going to be relevant to the .2 release. I just now moved some notes back from #1855 to #1786 (e.g., about S3). Sorry, my moving things around was probably a source of confusion. 😬 I don't think there's any issue, I just wanted to make a note of the two tracking issues.

One bullet that #1786 has that I think hasn't been captured yet is that users will no longer need to rebuild after configuring a custom cert. My understanding is that that's true of .2 even though it isn't just a change to .env, though maybe that's not right. But I think it makes sense to document that after this PR. I've copied the bullet to #1855 so we don't lose track of it.

@matthew-white matthew-white merged commit def2398 into getodk:master Sep 30, 2024
1 check passed
yanokwa pushed a commit to yanokwa/odk-docs that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants