Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 24, 2018. It is now read-only.

Added deprecation notice #1640

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Added deprecation notice #1640

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

rishidev
Copy link
Contributor

@rishidev rishidev commented Oct 3, 2017

At a GA4GH Meeting it was decided to formally halt work on the Reference Server

@ljdursi
Copy link

ljdursi commented Oct 3, 2017

I'd hope that decision could be revisited at the plenary...

@kozbo
Copy link
Contributor

kozbo commented Oct 5, 2017

I agree, this does deserve some discussion at the Plenary, though effectively, development has already halted. My team has been reassigned with other priorities. My team believes that the reference server is not meant to be a product. It provides one example of how one might implement a server to support the GA4GH data APIs, but we do not feel that it is a supportable development path. There are much more flexible and light weight approaches that can be taken.

The UCSC team has shifted its attention to studying the best ways to collect and provide access to RNA data via the HCA GA4GH driver project. We are also working on the GA4GH DREAM challenge for establishing APIs for reproducible workflows.

The opinions above do not prevent someone else from picking up the torch to extend or support the reference server.

@ljdursi
Copy link

ljdursi commented Oct 5, 2017

@kozbo - I agree with what you’ve said; I’d just like to see deprecation held off (and merging of PRs continue) until something(s) else appeared that this code base could be deprecated in favor of.

@rishidev
Copy link
Contributor Author

At a meeting on the future direction of the GA4GH GitHub and related matters, we had a discussion which was unanimous in how to proceed with the GitHub reference schema/server/test suites going forward. GA4GH itself is reorganising as a standards organisation. The master/working branch are 1000+ commits out of sync which noone has the engineering resources to reconcile. The plan is to extract schemas that will need future development, and focus on smaller, focused implementations of these items.

For full details see https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DKktWM7QiAisALxWddUqqTRmlC7zgl-5A0yqveXJljM/edit

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants