Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
portability: global structs cant be statically initialized with external symbols #3
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
portability: global structs cant be statically initialized with external symbols #3
Changes from all commits
cd869f5
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking closer at the QuickJS style, it looks like we should fix two inconsistencies here:
js_math_ceil()
instead ofqjs_ceil()
js_math_funcs
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
uhm not really. the js_* functions are javascript functions. what im wrapping here is libc functions
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
oh well. seems like js_math is also used to wrap c functions. so its a bit inconsistent. but ill follow their inconsistency
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actually the convnetion is just prefix them with
js_
because the direct calls are accessed thru thef_f
andf_f_f
functions and those are the ones that handle the js context insteadThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry just noticed one thing that I missed last time 😓 Is there a reason
floor()
andceil()
are wrapped but notfabs()
,acos()
, etc.?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
the compiler didnt complained about those.. for some unknown reason