Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a "Talks" and "Resources" section #35

Closed
mathieucarbou opened this issue Apr 18, 2016 · 4 comments
Closed

Add a "Talks" and "Resources" section #35

mathieucarbou opened this issue Apr 18, 2016 · 4 comments

Comments

@mathieucarbou
Copy link
Member

In the documentation section, we could add a "Talk" section with the following links:

Bringing javax.cache'ing to your application

Terracotta's OffHeap Explained

Ehcache 3: JSR-107 on steroids

There are the ones I know but I guess there are plenty other ones :-)

@ljacomet
Copy link
Member

@mathieucarbou As I commented in your PR, we already have that information in the events section.

I do not think we should duplicate it, but clearly have a link to events from the main documentation page seems an improvement.

Makes sense?

@mathieucarbou
Copy link
Member Author

mathieucarbou commented Apr 29, 2016

Yes @ljacomet ! Just adding these links in the event section would be sufficient. The idea behind that is to have a place where we can point to talks AND blog posts or other resources. That's why I added the word "resources", and added taks into.
Currently I did not see any place where we could point to external resources talking about Ehcache. It could be Spring - Ehcache integration doc, Hibernate one, blog posts, articles on Stack Overflow, etc.

@mathieucarbou mathieucarbou changed the title Add a "Talks" section Add a "Talks" and section Apr 29, 2016
@mathieucarbou mathieucarbou changed the title Add a "Talks" and section Add a "Talks" and "Resources" section Apr 29, 2016
@mathieucarbou
Copy link
Member Author

Renamed the title just to match what I wanted to do ;-)

@mathieucarbou
Copy link
Member Author

Replaced by #49

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants