Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(zfcp_rules): correct shellcheck regression when parsing ccw args #2630

Merged

Conversation

aafeijoo-suse
Copy link
Member

Checklist

  • I have tested it locally
  • I have reviewed and updated any documentation if relevant
  • I am providing new code and test(s) for it

Fixes 032ecd9

@github-actions github-actions bot added modules Issue tracker for all modules zfcp_rules Issues related to the zfcp_rules module labels Feb 28, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@Vogtinator Vogtinator left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might be worth checking other places whether they got similarly broken.

@aafeijoo-suse
Copy link
Member Author

Might be worth checking other places whether they got similarly broken.

I agree

@aafeijoo-suse
Copy link
Member Author

BTW this file will be removed by #2534, so I don't know if this fix makes sense upstream at this point.

Copy link
Collaborator

@tblume tblume left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Collaborator

@johannbg johannbg left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@johannbg johannbg merged commit 5d2bda4 into dracutdevs:master Mar 21, 2024
100 of 107 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
modules Issue tracker for all modules zfcp_rules Issues related to the zfcp_rules module
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants