chore(deps): update dependency nunit.analyzers to 4.3.0

[renovate]

This PR contains the following updates:

Package	Change	Age	Adoption	Passing	Confidence
NUnit.Analyzers	4.2.0 -> 4.3.0

---

Release Notes

nunit/nunit.analyzers (NUnit.Analyzers)

v4.3.0: NUnit Analyzers 4.3 - August 9, 2024

Compare Source

NUnit Analyzers 4.3 - August 9, 2024

This release of the NUnit Analyzers contains some bug fixes to existing analyzers and code fixes - among other
improvements to trivia when using the code fix of NUnit2049.

For new features we now warn against using TestContext.Write as this will be obsolete in NUnit at some point;
NUnit1001 now recognises and check generic TestCase attributes; and we have added a new analyzer and code fix for
simplifying usages of ValuesAttribute.

The release contains contributions from the following users (in alphabetical order):

• @​andrewimcclement
• @​Bartleby2718
• @​DrPepperBianco
• @​KaiBNET
• @​maettu-this
• @​manfred-brands
• @​mikkelbu
• @​RenderMichael
• @​SeanKilleen
• @​trampster

Issues Resolved

Features and Enhancements

• #​770 Add rule to detect calls to TestContext.Write methods and CodeFix to replace usages with Out.Write
• #​767 Augment NUnit1001 to recognized and check generic TestCase attributes
• #​755 New diagnostic: The Values attribute can be simplified.

Bugs

• #​766 Error when TearDown method is defined in partial test classes - Syntax node is not within syntax tree
• #​743 NUnit1032 (missing Dispose), if dispose is wrapped in "(… as IDisposable)?.Dispose()"
• #​739 Null suppression does not work when Assert is fully qualified
• #​713 Code fix for NUnit2049 places the comma at a wrong place and messes up indentation bug

Tooling, Process, and Documentation

• #​764 Update the solution file
• #​761 Update nunit.analyzers.nuspec to specify that NUnit.Analyzers v4 is intended to be used with NUnit 4.
• #​756 error NUnit1032 is incorrect when InstancePerTestCase and constructor is used to initialize IDisposible
• #​741 chore(deps): Bump Microsoft.NET.Test.Sdk from 17.9.0 to 17.10.0 in /src
• #​737 Update NUnit2013.md to fix code block
• #​736 chore: bump version
• #​734 Why dropping composite message formatting support also for Assert.Pass/Fail/... where there are no actual and constraint parameters?

---

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.

---

• If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

---

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 81.55%. Comparing base (80108ea) to head (6844c27).
Report is 1 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #523      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   81.66%   81.55%   -0.11%     
==========================================
  Files          51       51              
  Lines        2825     2825              
  Branches      310      310              
==========================================
- Hits         2307     2304       -3     
- Misses        418      420       +2     
- Partials      100      101       +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.