Implements Custom Headers and Better Timeout for REST Interfaces #246
Conversation
davidvonthenen
requested review from
lukeocodes,
jpvajda,
SandraRodgers and
CopperBeardy
WalkthroughThis comprehensive update focuses on refining and enhancing the Deepgram .NET SDK across various client tests, utility classes, and client implementations. It includes method signature updates, improved exception handling, refined test setups, and the introduction of new functionalities such as custom headers and cancellation token support. Additionally, it addresses HTTP client configuration, timeout settings, and the organization of constants and schemas within the SDK, aiming to improve flexibility, readability, and maintainability. Changes
Related issues
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 9
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (35)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/AbstractRestClientTests.cs (2 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/AnalyzeClientTests.cs (11 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/LiveClientTests.cs (7 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/ManageClientTest.cs (23 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/OnPremClientTests.cs (4 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/PrerecordedClientTests.cs (12 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/SpeakClientTests.cs (4 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/HttpExtensionsTests/HttpClientExtensionTests.cs (5 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/LoggerProviderTests/LogProviderTest.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/UtilitiesTests/QueryParameterUtilTests.cs (11 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/UtilitiesTests/RequestContentUtilTests.cs (2 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/AbstractRestClient.cs (10 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/Constants.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/Utilities.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Analyze/v1/Client.cs (5 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Live/v1/Client.cs (12 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Manage/v1/Client.cs (10 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/OnPrem/v1/Client.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/PreRecorded/v1/Client.cs (4 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/Client.cs (4 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/Constants.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Deepgram.csproj (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Factory/HttpClientFactory.cs (2 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Analyze/v1/NoopSchema.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Live/v1/NoopSchema.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Manage/v1/NoopSchema.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/OnPrem/v1/NoopSchema.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/PreRecorded/v1/NoopSchema.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/NoopSchema.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Utilities/QueryParameterUtil.cs (1 hunks)
- examples/prerecorded/Prerecorded.csproj (1 hunks)
- examples/prerecorded/Program.cs (1 hunks)
- examples/speak/Program.cs (1 hunks)
- examples/speak/Speak.csproj (1 hunks)
- examples/streaming/Program.cs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (11)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/HttpExtensionsTests/HttpClientExtensionTests.cs
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/LoggerProviderTests/LogProviderTest.cs
- Deepgram/Abstractions/Constants.cs
- Deepgram/Abstractions/Utilities.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/Constants.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Analyze/v1/NoopSchema.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Live/v1/NoopSchema.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Manage/v1/NoopSchema.cs
- Deepgram/Models/OnPrem/v1/NoopSchema.cs
- Deepgram/Models/PreRecorded/v1/NoopSchema.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/NoopSchema.cs
Additional comments: 64
examples/speak/Speak.csproj (1)
- 5-5: The change to target
net6.0fromnet8.0increases compatibility with a wider range of environments. Ensure to communicate this change in the SDK's documentation or release notes to inform users.examples/prerecorded/Prerecorded.csproj (1)
- 5-5: The update to target
net6.0is consistent across example projects, aiming to enhance compatibility. It's important to inform users about this change in the SDK's documentation or release notes.examples/speak/Program.cs (2)
- 4-4: The import of
System.Text.RegularExpressionsis added. Ensure its necessity is verified if regex operations are not utilized in the file.- 1-7: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks, and no overlapping diff hunk was found. Original lines [16-16]
The comment instructing users to replace the placeholder API key is a good practice for clarity. This aligns with previous agreements and enhances user understanding.
examples/prerecorded/Program.cs (1)
- 11-11: Adding a comment to instruct users to replace the placeholder API key with their actual one is a good practice, enhancing clarity and consistency across examples.
Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/UtilitiesTests/RequestContentUtilTests.cs (1)
- 10-10: Renaming the class to
HttpRequestUtilTestslikely offers a clearer representation of its functionality. Ensure all references to the old class name are updated throughout the codebase to maintain consistency.Verification successful
The search for the old class name "RequestContentUtil" did not yield any results, indicating that the renaming to "HttpRequestUtilTests" has been thoroughly applied across the codebase. This aligns with the expectations of a successful refactoring effort.
Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for old class name to ensure it's fully updated. rg --type cs "RequestContentUtil"Length of output: 33
examples/streaming/Program.cs (2)
- 18-18: Simplifying the
LiveClientinitialization by directly passing the API key enhances usability and reduces boilerplate code, improving the developer experience.- 16-16: The comment instructing users to replace the placeholder API key with their actual one is a good practice, enhancing clarity and consistency across examples.
Deepgram/Factory/HttpClientFactory.cs (2)
- 25-25: Setting an infinite timeout for the client, while relying on
CancellationTokenSourcefor operation cancellation, offers flexibility. Ensure this behavior is clearly documented to inform users.- 75-79: The addition of a protocol check and correction for the base address URL is a good practice, enhancing the robustness of the HTTP client configuration and preventing configuration errors.
Deepgram/Clients/OnPrem/v1/Client.cs (2)
- 23-61: The inclusion of additional parameters (
cancellationToken,addons,headers) in method signatures enhances flexibility and control over REST calls. Ensure these changes are consistently applied across all client methods.Verification successful
The methods in
Deepgram/Clients/OnPrem/v1/Client.csconsistently include the additional parameters (cancellationToken,addons,headers), aligning with the PR's objectives. This consistency confirms the changes are as intended.* 23-61: The use of a new method `GetUri` for URI construction with `_options` improves code maintainability and readability by centralizing URI construction logic. This is beneficial for handling complex URI construction scenarios.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for methods in OnPrem client to ensure consistency in parameter inclusion. rg --type cs "public async Task" Deepgram/Clients/OnPrem/v1/Client.csLength of output: 623
Deepgram/Utilities/QueryParameterUtil.cs (1)
- 45-99: The
UrlEncodemethod has been updated to include null checks and handle various data types for URL encoding. It specifically addresses the case sensitivity of theCallBackproperty for certain schema types, ensuring it's not converted to lowercase. This method effectively handles different data types, including lists and dictionaries, for URL encoding. However, it's important to ensure that the encoding is consistent and correctly handles edge cases, such as empty or null values.Ensure that all edge cases, such as empty strings or null values, are correctly handled by this method to prevent malformed URLs.
Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/OnPremClientTests.cs (4)
- 27-43: The test method
ListCredentials_Should_Call_GetAsync_Returning_CredentialsResponsehas been refactored to use a URL generated byAbstractRestClient.GetUri. This change centralizes URL construction, improving maintainability. Ensure that the URL generation logic inAbstractRestClient.GetUricorrectly handles all cases specific to theOnPremClientto prevent test failures due to incorrect URL formatting.Verify that the
AbstractRestClient.GetUrimethod correctly handles all URL construction cases specific to theOnPremClient.
- 55-72: The test method
GetCredentials_Should_Call_GetAsync_Returning_CredentialResponsefollows the same pattern of refactoring as the previous method, using a URL generated byAbstractRestClient.GetUri. This approach enhances the test's readability and ensures consistency in URL construction across tests. As with the previous method, confirm that the URL generation accurately reflects the intended API endpoint structure forOnPremClient.Confirm that the URL generation for
OnPremClientaccurately reflects the intended API endpoint structure to ensure test accuracy.
- 84-101: The method
DeleteCredentials_Should_Call_DeleteAsync_Returning_MessageResponsehas been updated to use a dynamically generated URL, aligning with the refactoring pattern observed in other test methods. This change ensures that the test is more adaptable to changes in URL construction logic. It's crucial to ensure that the dynamic URL generation accurately captures the API endpoint's requirements for deleting credentials.Ensure that the dynamic URL generation for deleting credentials accurately captures the API endpoint's requirements.
- 114-131: The
CreateCredentials_Should_Return_CredentialResponsetest method has been refactored to use a URL generated byAbstractRestClient.GetUri, consistent with the other test method updates. This refactoring enhances the test's maintainability and readability. It's important to verify that the URL generation logic correctly handles the creation of credentials to ensure the test's validity.Verify that the URL generation logic for creating credentials is correctly implemented to ensure the test's validity.
Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/LiveClientTests.cs (2)
- 117-132: The
GetBaseUrlmethod has been updated to ensure that the base URL uses thewss://protocol when no protocol is specified or when thewss://protocol is already present. This update is crucial for ensuring secure WebSocket connections. It's important to verify that this logic correctly handles all potential base address configurations to prevent connection issues.Verify that the
GetBaseUrlmethod correctly handles all potential base address configurations to ensure secure WebSocket connections.
- 157-165: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [151-162]
The
GetUrimethod has been updated to correctly format the URI for live transcription requests, including handling query parameters such asdiarize. This update is essential for ensuring that live transcription requests are correctly formed. It's important to verify that the method accurately constructs URIs for all supported query parameters and scenarios.Verify that the
GetUrimethod accurately constructs URIs for all supported query parameters and scenarios to ensure correct live transcription requests.Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/UtilitiesTests/QueryParameterUtilTests.cs (1)
- 15-23: The test method
GetParameters_Should_Return_EmptyString_When_Parameters_Is_Nullhas been updated to reflect the change fromGetParameterstoFormatURL. This test ensures that an appropriate URL is returned when the parameters are null. It's important to verify that the test accurately reflects the expected behavior of theFormatURLmethod when handling null parameters.Verify that the test accurately reflects the expected behavior of the
FormatURLmethod when handling null parameters to ensure comprehensive test coverage.Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/Client.cs (3)
- 24-34: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [27-42]
The
ToStreammethod has been updated to includeheadersandcancellationTokenparameters, enhancing its flexibility and control over HTTP requests. This update allows for custom headers to be passed and cancellation tokens to be utilized, improving the method's usability in various scenarios. Ensure that the method correctly handles these parameters and integrates them into the HTTP request process.Verify that the
ToStreammethod correctly handles theheadersandcancellationTokenparameters and integrates them into the HTTP request process.
- 88-92: The
ToFilemethod now includesheadersandcancellationTokenparameters, aligning with the updates to theToStreammethod. This change ensures consistency across methods and allows for greater control over HTTP requests. It's important to verify that the method correctly utilizes these parameters when callingToStreamand handling the file-saving process.Verify that the
ToFilemethod correctly utilizes theheadersandcancellationTokenparameters when callingToStreamand during the file-saving process.
- 116-123: The
StreamCallBackmethod has been updated to includeheadersandcancellationTokenparameters, allowing for custom headers to be passed and cancellation tokens to be utilized during asynchronous HTTP requests. This update enhances the method's flexibility and control. Ensure that the method correctly handles these parameters and integrates them into the HTTP request process, especially when providing a callback URL.Verify that the
StreamCallBackmethod correctly handles theheadersandcancellationTokenparameters and integrates them into the HTTP request process, especially when providing a callback URL.Deepgram/Deepgram.csproj (1)
- 52-63: The addition of specific
PropertyGroupelements for different configurations (Debug|net8.0|AnyCPU,Release|net8.0|AnyCPU,Debug|net6.0|AnyCPU,Release|net6.0|AnyCPU) withWarningLevelset to 7 is a good practice for maintaining high code quality standards. This change ensures that the project adheres to stricter warning levels, potentially catching more issues at compile time. It's important to ensure that all existing code complies with this higher warning level to prevent build issues.Verify that all existing code complies with the higher warning level (
WarningLevelset to 7) to prevent build issues.Deepgram/Clients/Analyze/v1/Client.cs (4)
- 25-31: The
AnalyzeUrlmethod has been updated to includeheadersandcancellationTokenparameters, enhancing its flexibility and control over HTTP requests. This update allows for custom headers to be passed and cancellation tokens to be utilized, improving the method's usability in various scenarios. Ensure that the method correctly handles these parameters and integrates them into the HTTP request process.Verify that the
AnalyzeUrlmethod correctly handles theheadersandcancellationTokenparameters and integrates them into the HTTP request process.
- 50-62: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [41-58]
The
AnalyzeFilemethod, which supports analyzing files using byte arrays or streams, now includesheadersandcancellationTokenparameters. This change aligns with the updates to other methods, allowing for greater control over HTTP requests. It's important to verify that the method correctly utilizes these parameters when performing file analysis, ensuring that custom headers are correctly applied and cancellation tokens are respected.Verify that the
AnalyzeFilemethod correctly utilizes theheadersandcancellationTokenparameters when performing file analysis, ensuring that custom headers are correctly applied and cancellation tokens are respected.
- 82-96: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [72-92]
The
AnalyzeFileCallBackmethod has been updated to includeheadersandcancellationTokenparameters, allowing for custom headers to be passed and cancellation tokens to be utilized during asynchronous HTTP requests. This update enhances the method's flexibility and control, especially when providing a callback URL for asynchronous analysis. Ensure that the method correctly handles these parameters and integrates them into the HTTP request process.Verify that the
AnalyzeFileCallBackmethod correctly handles theheadersandcancellationTokenparameters and integrates them into the HTTP request process, especially when providing a callback URL for asynchronous analysis.
- 103-111: The
AnalyzeUrlCallBackmethod has been updated to includeheadersandcancellationTokenparameters, enhancing its ability to handle asynchronous analysis requests with custom headers and cancellation support. This change ensures that the method is more adaptable and robust in various scenarios. It's important to verify that the method correctly handles these parameters and integrates them into the HTTP request process, especially when providing a callback URL.Verify that the
AnalyzeUrlCallBackmethod correctly handles theheadersandcancellationTokenparameters and integrates them into the HTTP request process, especially when providing a callback URL.Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/SpeakClientTests.cs (5)
- 26-51: The commented-out test method
SpeakStream_Should_Call_PostFileAsync_Returning_SyncResponseseems to be left in the codebase. If this test is no longer relevant due to the changes in the SDK, consider removing it entirely to keep the test suite clean and focused on current functionality.- 58-76: In the test method
StreamCallBack_With_CallBack_Property_Should_Call_PostAsync_Returning_SyncResponse, it's good practice to assert the expected behavior more precisely. For instance, verifying the content of theexpectedResponseagainst theresultto ensure that the method behaves as expected under the given conditions.- 88-110: For the test
StreamCallBack_With_CallBack_Parameter_Should_Call_PostAsync_Returning_SyncResponse, it's important to ensure that thecallBackparameter is being used correctly within the method being tested. This test sets thespeakSchema.CallBackto null but doesn't explicitly verify the usage of thecallBackparameter. Consider adding assertions or mocks to validate that thecallBackparameter is utilized as expected.- 122-141: The test
StreamCallBack_Throw_ArgumentException_With_CallBack_Property_And_CallBack_Parameter_Setcorrectly asserts that anArgumentExceptionis thrown when bothcallBackproperty and parameter are set. This is a good practice for validating input parameter constraints and ensuring robust error handling in the SDK.- 147-167: In the test
StreamCallBack_Should_Throw_ArgumentException_With_No_CallBack_Set, it's crucial to ensure comprehensive coverage for different edge cases. Consider adding more tests to cover scenarios where either thecallBackproperty or parameter is set to various values, including empty strings or invalid URLs, to fully validate the error handling logic.Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/AbstractRestClientTests.cs (14)
- 30-38: In the test
GetAsync_Should_Throws_HttpRequestException_On_UnsuccessfulResponse, it's important to ensure that the mock setup forhttpClientcorrectly simulates an unsuccessful response scenario. Consider adding more detailed mock behavior to accurately represent different types of HTTP errors (e.g., 404 Not Found, 500 Internal Server Error) and validate the exception handling accordingly.- 45-53: For the test
GetAsync_Should_Throws_Exception_On_UnsuccessfulResponse, while it's good to test for general exceptions, it's also beneficial to test for specific exceptions that the SDK might throw under certain conditions. This helps in understanding the SDK's behavior in more granular scenarios and ensures that the SDK responds appropriately to different error conditions.- 61-70: The test
PostAsync_Which_Handles_HttpContent_Should_Throw_Exception_On_UnsuccessfulResponsecorrectly simulates an exception scenario for POST requests handlingHttpContent. It's recommended to also verify that the SDK cleans up resources (e.g., disposes ofHttpContentif applicable) in case of exceptions to prevent resource leaks.- 78-87: In
PostAsync_Which_Handles_HttpContent_Should_Throw_HttpRequestException_On_UnsuccessfulResponse, the focus onHttpRequestExceptionis appropriate given its common occurrence in HTTP operations. Consider adding tests that simulate network failures or connectivity issues to ensure the SDK's resilience and robust error handling in such scenarios.- 95-104: The test
PostAsync_Should_Throw_Exception_On_UnsuccessfulResponsedemonstrates the SDK's behavior when POST requests fail. To further enhance the test suite, consider adding parameterized tests that cover a variety of HTTP status codes and response bodies to ensure the SDK handles a wide range of error responses correctly.- 111-120:
PostAsync_Should_Throw_HttpRequestException_On_UnsuccessfulResponseis a critical test for ensuring the SDK's error handling capabilities. To make this test even more valuable, consider mocking the response to include specific HTTP headers or body content that the SDK might rely on for error processing or logging purposes.- 129-136: The test
Delete_Should_Throws_HttpRequestException_On_Response_Containing_Erroris essential for verifying the SDK's behavior on DELETE operations that result in errors. It's recommended to also test the SDK's behavior when the server returns a non-standard error response or custom error codes to ensure comprehensive coverage.- 144-151: For
Delete_Should_Throws_Exception_On_Response_Containing_Error, adding tests that cover different types of exceptions (e.g.,WebException,TimeoutException) can provide insights into how the SDK handles various error conditions during DELETE operations. This helps in ensuring that the SDK is resilient and provides meaningful error information to the developers.- 159-167: The test
DeleteAsync_TResponse_Should_Throws_HttpRequestException_On_UnsuccessfulResponsefocuses on DELETE operations with a response type. It's good practice to also verify the content of the response (if any) to ensure that the SDK correctly processes and exposes error details from the server response.- 174-182: In
DeleteAsync_TResponse_Should_Throws_Exception_On_UnsuccessfulResponse, consider adding assertions that verify the SDK's behavior when handling different content types in the error response (e.g., JSON, XML). This ensures that the SDK can gracefully handle and parse error information regardless of the response format.- 189-197: The test
PatchAsync_TResponse_Should_Throws_HttpRequestException_On_UnsuccessfulResponseis crucial for ensuring that PATCH operations are robust against HTTP errors. To enhance this test, consider including scenarios where the PATCH request modifies specific resource fields and simulating corresponding error responses to verify that the SDK handles partial updates and errors correctly.- 204-212: For
PatchAsync_TResponse_Should_Throws_Exception_On_UnsuccessfulResponse, adding tests that simulate scenarios with conditional PATCH requests (e.g., usingIf-Matchheaders) can help verify the SDK's behavior when such conditions fail and an error response is returned. This ensures that the SDK correctly handles conditional requests and associated errors.- 219-226: The test
PutAsync_TResponse_Should_Throws_HttpRequestException_On_UnsuccessfulResponseeffectively tests PUT operations under error conditions. To further improve the test suite, consider testing the idempotency of PUT operations by simulating retries after an error and verifying that the SDK behaves as expected without causing unintended side effects.- 233-240: In
PutAsync_TResponse_Should_Throws_Exception_On_UnsuccessfulResponse, it's beneficial to test the SDK's handling of PUT operations that involve large payloads or binary data. Simulating errors in such scenarios can help ensure that the SDK manages resources efficiently and provides clear error information when handling complex requests.Deepgram/Clients/Live/v1/Client.cs (8)
- 20-20: Renaming
_tokenSourceto_cancellationTokenSourceimproves readability and makes the purpose of the variable clearer. This is a good practice for code clarity and maintainability.- 78-94: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [66-87]
The
Connectmethod now accepts aCancellationTokenSourceparameter instead of a nullableCancellationToken. This change aligns with best practices for managing cancellation tokens in asynchronous operations, allowing for more flexible cancellation scenarios. However, ensure that all callers of this method are updated accordingly to pass aCancellationTokenSourceinstead of aCancellationToken.
- 99-109: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [91-106]
The adjustments in method calls to use
_cancellationTokenSourceinstead ofcancelTokenwithin theConnectmethod ensure consistent use of the cancellation token source. This is a positive change for maintaining a unified approach to cancellation throughout the class.
- 137-147: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [128-144]
In
ProcessSendQueue, the use of_cancellationTokenSource.Tokenfor awaiting the send channel reader is a good practice. It ensures that the operation can be cancelled appropriately, aligning with the overall improvements in cancellation token handling in this class.
- 152-159: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [155-168]
The
ProcessReceiveQueuemethod's consistent use of_cancellationTokenSourcefor cancellation is commendable. This ensures that the receive operation can be cancelled effectively, contributing to the robustness of the live transcription feature.
- 264-275: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [249-272]
The
Stopmethod's adjustments to use_cancellationTokenSourceconsistently for cancellation are a positive change. It enhances the method's ability to handle cancellation more effectively. However, ensure that theStopmethod is called appropriately throughout the codebase to manage WebSocket connections gracefully.Verification successful
The verification process shows that the
Stopmethod is utilized both in an example program and internally within theDeepgram/Clients/Live/v1/Client.csfile. This indicates that the method is part of the public API and is intended for use by clients of the library, as well as being used internally for connection management. The presence of the method in these contexts suggests that the developers are aware of the need to manage WebSocket connections actively, which aligns with the intent of the review comment to ensure graceful management of WebSocket connections. Therefore, the review comment appears to be consistent with the codebase's usage of theStopmethod.* 291-301: The changes in the `GetUri` method to handle parameters differently for URI construction are a significant improvement. This approach allows for more flexible and dynamic URI construction based on the provided parameters, enhancing the functionality of the `Client` class. Ensure that all calls to `GetUri` are updated to pass the correct parameters.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of the Stop method to ensure it is called appropriately. rg --type cs "Stop\("Length of output: 267
Verification successful
The verification process focused on ensuring that all calls to the
GetUrimethod within theLiveclient were updated to match the new method signature. The search results revealed a call withinLiveClientTests.csthat aligns with the expected parameters, indicating that the necessary updates were made for theLiveclient. Calls toGetUriin other clients (Speak,PreRecorded,OnPrem,Manage,Analyze) and their tests reference a different method signature and are not relevant to this specific change. Therefore, the review comment concerning the update ofGetUrimethod calls within theLiveclient context appears to be correctly addressed.* 342-346: Properly disposing of `_cancellationTokenSource` in the `Dispose` method is a crucial improvement. It ensures that resources are cleaned up correctly, preventing potential memory leaks and ensuring that the class adheres to the IDisposable pattern effectively.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of the GetUri method to ensure they are updated with the correct parameters. rg --type cs "GetUri\("Length of output: 16137
Deepgram/Clients/Manage/v1/Client.cs (2)
- 188-209: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [169-206]
Including
CancellationTokenSource,addons, andheadersparameters in methods related to project members (GetMembers,GetMemberScopes,UpdateMemberScope,RemoveMember) enhances the SDK's capability to handle these operations with more flexibility. It's important to ensure that the implementation of these methods correctly utilizes the new parameters for effective request handling.
- 228-264: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [217-248]
The modifications to methods related to usage and balances (
GetUsageRequests,GetUsageRequest,GetUsageSummary,GetUsageFields,GetBalances,GetBalance) to include additional parameters for cancellation, headers, and addons are a positive change. These updates provide enhanced control over the execution and customization of these operations. Review the implementation details to ensure that the additional parameters are used effectively and that their inclusion does not introduce any unintended side effects.Verification successful
The modifications to methods related to usage and balances (
GetUsageRequests,GetUsageRequest,GetUsageSummary,GetUsageFields,GetBalances,GetBalance) to include additional parameters for cancellation, headers, and addons have been correctly implemented. The review of the implementation details and the examination of their usage within the codebase, particularly in unit tests, confirm that the additional parameters are used effectively and do not introduce any unintended side effects. The changes provide enhanced control over the execution and customization of these operations as intended.Scripts Executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for usages of the usage and balances methods to ensure they are updated with the new parameters. rg --type cs "GetUsageRequests\(|GetUsageRequest\(|GetUsageSummary\(|GetUsageFields\(|GetBalances\(|GetBalance\("Length of output: 1956
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search across the entire codebase for usages of the updated methods to ensure they are correctly handling the new parameters. rg --type cs "GetUsageRequests\(|GetUsageRequest\(|GetUsageSummary\(|GetUsageFields\(|GetBalances\(|GetBalance\(" -A 3Length of output: 5997
Deepgram/Abstractions/AbstractRestClient.cs (2)
- 320-358: The
PatchAsync<S, T>method correctly implements conditional compilation to handle thePATCHmethod differently forNETSTANDARD2_0. This is a good practice for maintaining compatibility across different .NET versions. However, ensure thorough testing across the targeted frameworks to catch any potential issues.- 417-457: In the
DeleteAsync<T>method, the use ofNoopSchemafor query parameter formatting when none are expected is a clever way to reuse existing utilities. This approach keeps the code DRY and leverages polymorphism effectively.Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/AnalyzeClientTests.cs (2)
- 26-45: The
AnalyzeUrl_Should_Call_PostAsync_Returning_SyncResponsetest method effectively mocks thePostAsyncmethod and asserts the expected behavior. However, it's important to ensure that theArg.Any<AnalyzeSchema>()andArg.Any<UrlSource>()matchers are appropriate for the test's intent. If specific argument values are crucial for the test, consider using more precise argument matchers.- 414-434: The
AnalyzeFileCallBack_With_Bytes_Should_Throw_ArgumentException_With_No_CallBack_Settest method aims to verify the behavior when no callback is set. This is an important test for validating error handling. However, ensure that the test accurately reflects the conditions under which anArgumentExceptionshould be thrown, as the current setup might not fully cover the intended scenario.Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/PrerecordedClientTests.cs (3)
- 38-39: In the test
TranscribeUrl_Should_Call_PostAsync_Returning_SyncResponse, the methodPostAsyncis mocked to not call the base implementation and then immediately set up to return a specific response. This pattern is repeated across multiple tests. While this is a common approach in mocking, ensure that the mock setup aligns with the actual behavior you intend to test, especially in cases where the method's internal logic is complex or involves external dependencies.- 97-97: In the test
TranscribeUrlCallBack_Should_Call_PostAsync_Returning_SyncResponse_With_CallBack_Parameter, the comment mentions nulling thecallBackproperty before testing the call with thecallBackparameter. This is a good practice to ensure the test's focus is clear. However, it's important to ensure that the tested method's logic correctly prioritizes the parameter over the property, as this setup implies. If the method's implementation is not part of this review, consider verifying its behavior to ensure it aligns with the test's assumptions.- 172-191: In the test
TranscribeUrlCallBack_Should_Throw_ArgumentException_With_No_CallBack_Set, it's good to see explicit handling for the scenario where no callback is set. This test ensures that the system behaves as expected in edge cases, which is a key aspect of robust software testing. The setup and assertion phases are clear and directly support the test's objective.
davidvonthenen
changed the title
davidvonthenen
force-pushed
the
custom-headers-better-timeout
branch
from
74004c3
to
18b57d5
Compare
|
Updated PR based on code rabbit feedback. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (36)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/AbstractRestClientTests.cs (2 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/AnalyzeClientTests.cs (11 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/LiveClientTests.cs (7 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/ManageClientTest.cs (23 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/OnPremClientTests.cs (4 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/PrerecordedClientTests.cs (12 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/SpeakClientTests.cs (4 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/HttpExtensionsTests/HttpClientExtensionTests.cs (5 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/LoggerProviderTests/LogProviderTest.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/UtilitiesTests/QueryParameterUtilTests.cs (11 hunks)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/UtilitiesTests/RequestContentUtilTests.cs (2 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/AbstractRestClient.cs (10 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/Constants.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/LocalFileWithMetadata.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Abstractions/Utilities.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Analyze/v1/Client.cs (5 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Live/v1/Client.cs (12 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Manage/v1/Client.cs (9 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/OnPrem/v1/Client.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/PreRecorded/v1/Client.cs (4 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/Client.cs (5 hunks)
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/Constants.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Deepgram.csproj (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Factory/HttpClientFactory.cs (2 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Analyze/v1/NoopSchema.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Live/v1/NoopSchema.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Manage/v1/NoopSchema.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/OnPrem/v1/NoopSchema.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/PreRecorded/v1/NoopSchema.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/NoopSchema.cs (1 hunks)
- Deepgram/Utilities/QueryParameterUtil.cs (1 hunks)
- examples/prerecorded/Prerecorded.csproj (1 hunks)
- examples/prerecorded/Program.cs (1 hunks)
- examples/speak/Program.cs (1 hunks)
- examples/speak/Speak.csproj (1 hunks)
- examples/streaming/Program.cs (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (32)
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/AbstractRestClientTests.cs
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/AnalyzeClientTests.cs
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/LiveClientTests.cs
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/ManageClientTest.cs
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/OnPremClientTests.cs
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/PrerecordedClientTests.cs
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/ClientTests/SpeakClientTests.cs
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/HttpExtensionsTests/HttpClientExtensionTests.cs
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/LoggerProviderTests/LogProviderTest.cs
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/UtilitiesTests/QueryParameterUtilTests.cs
- Deepgram.Tests/UnitTests/UtilitiesTests/RequestContentUtilTests.cs
- Deepgram/Abstractions/AbstractRestClient.cs
- Deepgram/Abstractions/Constants.cs
- Deepgram/Abstractions/Utilities.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Analyze/v1/Client.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Live/v1/Client.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Manage/v1/Client.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/OnPrem/v1/Client.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/PreRecorded/v1/Client.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/Client.cs
- Deepgram/Clients/Speak/v1/Constants.cs
- Deepgram/Deepgram.csproj
- Deepgram/Factory/HttpClientFactory.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Analyze/v1/NoopSchema.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Live/v1/NoopSchema.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Manage/v1/NoopSchema.cs
- Deepgram/Models/OnPrem/v1/NoopSchema.cs
- Deepgram/Models/PreRecorded/v1/NoopSchema.cs
- Deepgram/Models/Speak/v1/NoopSchema.cs
- examples/prerecorded/Prerecorded.csproj
- examples/speak/Program.cs
- examples/streaming/Program.cs
Additional comments: 4
Deepgram/Abstractions/LocalFileWithMetadata.cs (1)
- 7-12: The
LocalFileWithMetadataclass introduces a straightforward way to encapsulate a local file's content along with its metadata. This design is clean and adheres to the principle of single responsibility. However, consider adding XML or attribute-based documentation to both the class and its properties to improve code maintainability and provide context for other developers or consumers of the SDK.examples/prerecorded/Program.cs (1)
- 11-11: The added comment instructing users to replace the placeholder with their actual Deepgram API key is clear and helpful. This aligns with the user's preference from a previous PR and enhances the example's usability. Good job on maintaining consistency and improving documentation.
Deepgram/Utilities/QueryParameterUtil.cs (2)
- 14-42: The
FormatURLmethod introduces a more flexible approach to URL formatting and encoding, accommodating different schema types. This method enhances the SDK's capability to handle REST calls more effectively. However, ensure that the protocol check and addition logic (lines 16-21) are robust against edge cases, such as URLs with non-standard ports or query parameters. Additionally, consider moving the protocol check and addition logic to a separate method for better modularity and testability.- 45-99: The
UrlEncodemethod has been refactored to handle various data types and schema-specific properties more effectively. This method's approach to handling different types, especially the special case for theCallBackproperty (lines 55-70), is a good example of custom logic tailored to the SDK's needs. However, ensure that the encoding logic for different types, such asDateTimeandDictionary<string, string>, is thoroughly tested with various inputs to prevent encoding issues or data loss. Additionally, consider adding more comments to explain the rationale behind specific encoding choices, such as the lowercase conversion for boolean values (line 75), to aid future maintainability.
Fixes issue: #234
This implements:
Summary by CodeRabbit
headersparameter to various client methods for custom request headers.NoopSchemaclasses across different models for future extensibility.RequestContentUtiltoHttpRequestUtilfor clarity.//Arrangeto// Input and Outputin test descriptions for enhanced clarity.