Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add hudi feature #189

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

matthewmturner
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@matthewmturner matthewmturner changed the title Start adding hudi Add hudi feature Oct 13, 2024
datafusion-functions-json = { version = "0.41.0", optional = true }
deltalake = { version = "0.19.0", features = ["datafusion"], optional = true }
directories = "5.0.1"
env_logger = "0.11.5"
futures = "0.3.30"
http = "0.2.9"
http-body = {version = "0.4.5" }
hudi = { features = ["datafusion"], optional = true, git = "https://github.com/apache/hudi-rs", rev = "abb3e635a28af229ba1e872fd6005c381e2b7ded" }

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

you can use https://crates.io/crates/hudi/0.2.0-rc.1 now, and soon use 0.2.0 once the release is out.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@matthewmturner thanks for the work - any plan to move this forward?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@matthewmturner matthewmturner Nov 22, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes! I'm really looking forward to getting this merged. Unfortunately, it was held back back because we already have a deltalake feature but they werent able to upgrade datafusion for an extended period of time which prevented this from moving forward. It seems to finally be resolved and I hope to get this merged shortly.

Some other context:

  1. I dont plan on releasing next version until this and iceberg are added as features (those are basically the only blockers at this point)
  2. Because of how unfortunate this was i am considering a switch to the new FFI interface. The community has expressed interest in this as well, but i wouldnt expect that to come until after a release

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

that's good to know. thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants