Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Use RATTLER_CACHE_DIR instead of XDG_CACHE_HOME #28239

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Nov 19, 2024

Conversation

hadim
Copy link
Member

@hadim hadim commented Nov 16, 2024

Copy link

Hi! This is the staged-recipes linter and I found some lint.

It looks like some changes were made outside the recipes/ directory. To ensure everything runs smoothly, please make sure that recipes are only added to the recipes/ directory and no other files are changed.

If these changes are intentional (and you aren't submitting a recipe), please add a maintenance label to the PR.

File-specific lints and/or hints:

  • build-locally.py:
    • lints:
      • Do not edit files outside of the recipes/ directory.

@conda-forge-admin
Copy link
Contributor

Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service.

I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR () and found it was in an excellent condition.

Copy link

Hi! This is the staged-recipes linter and your PR looks excellent! 🚀

@jaimergp
Copy link
Member

Thanks! Ping me again once the new rattler-build is out!

@hadim
Copy link
Member Author

hadim commented Nov 18, 2024

I propose we wait for 0.31 to be on c-f before we merge here @jaimergp (https://github.com/conda-forge/rattler-build-feedstock)

@jaimergp jaimergp marked this pull request as ready for review November 19, 2024 07:59
@jaimergp jaimergp merged commit 9bf09da into conda-forge:main Nov 19, 2024
7 checks passed
@hadim hadim deleted the rattler_cache branch November 19, 2024 12:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants