Skip to content

Commit

Permalink
Update docs/layers/eks/design-decisions/decide-on-default-storage-cla…
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history 
…ss.mdx

Co-authored-by: Erik Osterman (CEO @ Cloud Posse) <[email protected]>
  • Loading branch information
@milldr @osterman
milldr and osterman authored Oct 24, 2024
1 parent 30850e2 commit c8beb62
Showing 1 changed file with 3 additions and 3 deletions.
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions docs/layers/eks/design-decisions/decide-on-default-storage-class.mdx
View file
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -31,9 +31,9 @@ We need to decide between **Amazon EFS (Elastic File System)** and **Amazon EBS
- **Managed Service:** Fully managed by AWS, reducing operational overhead for maintenance and scaling.

### Cons:
- **Performance:** Generally offers lower performance compared to EBS, with throughput as low as 100 MB/s, which may not meet the demands of even modestly demanding applications.
- **Cost:** Significantly more expensive than EBS, at least 3x the price per GB and potentially more depending on performance demands, although there may be some savings from not having to reserve size for future growth.
- **Latency:** Higher latency compared to EBS, which may impact performance-sensitive applications.
- **Lower Performance:** Generally offers lower performance compared to EBS, with throughput as low as 100 MB/s, which may not meet the demands of even modestly demanding applications.
- **Higher Cost:** Significantly more expensive than EBS, at least 3x the price per GB and potentially more depending on performance demands, although there may be some savings from not having to reserve size for future growth.
- **Higher Latency:** Higher latency compared to EBS, which may impact performance-sensitive applications.

## Amazon EBS

Expand Down

0 comments on commit c8beb62

Please sign in to comment.