Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI: move to github container registry #7652

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
Jul 12, 2024
Merged

CI: move to github container registry #7652

merged 7 commits into from
Jul 12, 2024

Conversation

thanodnl
Copy link
Member

@thanodnl thanodnl commented Jul 10, 2024

We move the CI images to the github container registry.

Given we mostly (if not solely) run these containers on github actions infra it makes sense to have them hosted closer to where they are needed.

Image changes: citusdata/the-process#157

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 10, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 89.70%. Comparing base (58fef24) to head (177254d).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #7652      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   89.70%   89.70%   -0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         283      283              
  Lines       60508    60507       -1     
  Branches     7539     7539              
==========================================
- Hits        54277    54275       -2     
- Misses       4075     4076       +1     
  Partials     2156     2156              

@thanodnl thanodnl requested a review from hanefi July 11, 2024 11:38
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ verify_ssl = true

[packages]
mitmproxy = {editable = true, ref = "main", git = "https://github.com/citusdata/mitmproxy.git"}
construct = "==2.9.45"
construct = "*"
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't exactly know what I ran here, but it is odd to me that it changed it to a *. Will have a look once I get back to see if I can pin this to the current version to prevent unexpected changes in the future

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did not really understand how it does not cause any problem for us to have many * versions in the rest of this file. Maybe there is not much risk at all.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could be, given there are more it might be ok?

@@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ pytest-timeout = "*"
pytest-xdist = "*"
pytest-repeat = "*"
pyyaml = "*"
werkzeug = "==2.3.7"
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Guess once this was added the file hasn't been copied to the devcontainer. Guess thats an extra CI job to setup :P. Not super important, but now it will get incorporated with this change.

Copy link
Member

@hanefi hanefi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Totally acceptable that ol/7 and el/7 tests are failing.

We will drop support for them in #7650 anyway.

.github/workflows/build_and_test.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ verify_ssl = true

[packages]
mitmproxy = {editable = true, ref = "main", git = "https://github.com/citusdata/mitmproxy.git"}
construct = "==2.9.45"
construct = "*"
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I did not really understand how it does not cause any problem for us to have many * versions in the rest of this file. Maybe there is not much risk at all.

@hanefi hanefi merged commit e776a7e into main Jul 12, 2024
122 of 126 checks passed
@hanefi hanefi deleted the move-ci-images-to-ghcr branch July 12, 2024 08:26
@hanefi hanefi restored the move-ci-images-to-ghcr branch July 12, 2024 08:26
@hanefi hanefi deleted the move-ci-images-to-ghcr branch July 12, 2024 08:29
hanefi pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2024
We move the CI images to the github container registry.

Given we mostly (if not solely) run these containers on github actions
infra it makes sense to have them hosted closer to where they are
needed.

Image changes: citusdata/the-process#157

(cherry picked from commit e776a7e)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants