Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added the leopard dataset .yaml #2396

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

KhrystynaFaryna
Copy link

Issue #, if available:

Description of changes:

Added the Leopard challenge dataset.

By submitting this pull request, I confirm that you can use, modify, copy, and redistribute this contribution, under the terms of your choice.

@KhrystynaFaryna
Copy link
Author

Hi, I am not sure what to do next.

@kc00k
Copy link
Contributor

kc00k commented Oct 28, 2024

Hi, I am not sure what to do next.

Hi @KhrystynaFaryna can you confirm your uploading of data is complete? When we merge this your landing page will be live in the Registry of Open Data.

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
Name: LEarning biOchemical Prostate cAncer Recurrence from histopathology sliDes challenge (LEOPARD) Dataset
Description: |
"This dataset contains the all data for the [LEarning biOchemical Prostate cAncer Recurrence from histopathology sliDes challenge or LEOPARD](https://leopard.grand-challenge.org/).Prostate cancer, impacting 1.4 million men annually, is a prevalent malignancy ([H. Sung et al., 2021](https://acsjournals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.3322/caac.21660)). A substantial number of these individuals undergo prostatectomy as the primary curative treatment. The efficacy of this surgery is assessed, in part, by monitoring the concentration of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) in the bloodstream. While the role of PSA in prostate cancer screening is debatable ([W. F. Clark et al., 2018;](https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2680553) [E. A. M. Heijnsdijk et al., 2018](https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002/ijc.31102)), it serves as a valuable biomarker for postprostatectomy follow-up in patients. Following successful surgery, PSA concentration is typically undetectable (<0.1 ng/mL) within 4-6 weeks ([S. S. Goonewardene et al., 2014](https://wchh.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/tre.407)). However, approximately 30% of patients experience biochemical recurrence, signifying the resurgence of prostate cancer cells. This recurrence serves as a prognostic indicator for progression to clinical metastases and eventual prostate cancer-related mortality ([C. L. Amling, 2014;](https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10840432/) [S. J. Freedland et al., 2005;](https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/201291) [M. Han et al., 2001;](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0094014305701634?via%3Dihub) [T. Van den Broeck et al., 2001](http://prognostic%20value%20of%20biochemical%20recurrence%20following%20treatment%20with%20curative%20intent%20for%20prostate%20cancer:%20A%20Systematic%20Review/)). Current clinical practices gauge the risk of biochemical recurrence by considering the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade, PSA value at diagnosis, and TNM staging criteria ([J. I. Epstein et al., 2016](https://journals.lww.com/ajsp/abstract/2016/02000/the_2014_international_society_of_urological.10.aspx)). A recent European consensus guideline suggests categorizing patients into low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups based on these factors ([N. Mottet et al., 2021](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0302283820307697?via%3Dihub)). Notably, a high ISUP grade independently assigns a patient to the intermediate (grade 2/3) or high-risk group (grade 4/5). The Gleason growth patterns, representing morphological patterns of prostate cancer, are used to categorize cancerous tissue into ISUP grade groups ([J. I. Epstein, 2010;](https://www.auajournals.org/doi/10.1016/j.juro.2009.10.046) [P. M. Pierorazio et al., 2013;](https://bjui-journals.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1464-410X.2012.11611.x) [G. J. L. H. van Leenders et al., 2020;](https://journals.lww.com/ajsp/fulltext/2020/08000/the_2019_international_society_of_urological.1.aspx) [J. I. Epstein et al., 2016](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0302283815005576?via%3Dihub)). However, the ISUP grade has limitations, such as grading disagreement among pathologists ([J. I. Epstein et al., 2016](https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0302283815005576?via%3Dihub)) and coarse descriptors of tissue morphology. Recently, deep learning was shown ([H. Pinckaers et al., 2022](https://www.nature.com/articles/s43856-022-00126-3); [O. Eminaga et. al., 2024](https://www.nature.com/articles/s44303-023-00005-z?utm_source=rct_congratemailt&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=oa_20240306&utm_content=10.1038/s44303-023-00005-z)) to be able to predict the biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer.  Hypothesizing that deep learning could uncover finer morphological features' prognostic value, we are organizing the LEarning biOchemical Prostate cAncer Recurrence from histopathology sliDes (LEOPARD) challenge. The goal of this challenge is to yield top-performance deep learning solutions to predict the time to biochemical recurrence from H&E-stained histopathological tissue sections, i.e. based on morphological features.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would indeed prefer to use the link you provided (https://www.nature.com/articles/s44303-023-00005-z). Should I modify the .yaml and upload/push it again? The data upload is complete.

Copy link
Contributor

@kc00k kc00k Oct 30, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @KhrystynaFaryna, yes please push that change and also just confirm this URL works from your YAML - [T. Van den Broeck et al., 2001] http://prognostic%20value%20of%20biochemical%20recurrence%20following%20treatment%20with%20curative%20intent%20for%20prostate%20cancer:%20A%20Systematic%20Review/ I cannot seem to get it to work.

Once those are done I will merge.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I updated the .yaml

@kc00k
Copy link
Contributor

kc00k commented Nov 12, 2024

@KhrystynaFaryna could please update your branch as I see "This branch is out-of-date with the base branch". I will be able to merge after that. Thanks

@KhrystynaFaryna
Copy link
Author

I have updated the branch.

@kc00k
Copy link
Contributor

kc00k commented Nov 25, 2024

Hi @KhrystynaFaryna you seem to have made two leopard.yaml files. Please only keep the datasets/leopard.yaml file and remove the other leopard.yaml file. See image for reference
Screenshot 2024-11-25 at 12 16 21 PM
:

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants