Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

When installing existing assessment, don't autoselect all #2226

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 25, 2024

Conversation

jlge
Copy link
Contributor

@jlge jlge commented Sep 29, 2024

Description

  • title

Motivation and Context

Resolves #2220

How Has This Been Tested?

Go to an assessment, delete it, then go to "Install Assessment" and view that the uninstalled assessments aren't automatically checked.
BEFORE:
image
AFTER:
image

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Checklist:

  • I have run rubocop and erblint for style check. If you haven't, run overcommit --install && overcommit --sign to use pre-commit hook for linting
  • My change requires a change to the documentation, which is located at Autolab Docs
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly, included in this PR

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 29, 2024

📝 Walkthrough
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request modifies the _install_assessment_table.html.erb file to change the default state of a checkbox related to assessments from checked to unchecked. Additionally, it updates the class of the label associated with the checkbox for improved styling or identification. These changes aim to enhance user experience when installing assessments without pre-selecting all options.

Changes

File Change Summary
app/views/assessments/_install_assessment_table.html.erb Updated checkbox default state from checked to unchecked and changed label class to assessment-checkbox.
app/assets/stylesheets/install_assessment.css.scss Introduced new CSS class .assessment-checkbox for flexbox layout and centered content.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
When installing existing assessment, don't autoselect all (#2220)

Possibly related PRs

  • Assessment display changes #2205: The addition of the .category-card class in the index.html.erb file is related to the introduction of the .assessment-checkbox class in the CSS file, as both changes involve enhancing the visual presentation of assessment-related elements.

Suggested reviewers

  • 20wildmanj

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@jlge jlge requested review from a team and KesterTan and removed request for a team September 29, 2024 16:50
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
app/views/assessments/_install_assessment_table.html.erb (1)

48-49: LGTM! Changes align with PR objectives.

The modifications successfully implement the desired behavior of not auto-selecting assessments by default. This aligns well with the PR objectives and should improve the user experience.

A minor suggestion for improvement:

Consider adding an aria-label attribute to the checkbox for better accessibility. For example:

- <%= check_box_tag asmt_file, asmt_file, false, class: 'cbox', id: "#{asmt_file}_checkbox" %>
+ <%= check_box_tag asmt_file, asmt_file, false, class: 'cbox', id: "#{asmt_file}_checkbox", 'aria-label': "Select #{asmt_file} for installation" %>

This change would provide more context to users relying on screen readers.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between be48fe4 and b4d21ba.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/views/assessments/_install_assessment_table.html.erb (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/views/assessments/_install_assessment_table.html.erb (2)

Line range hint 1-80: Summary: Changes successfully implement PR objectives

The modifications in this file effectively implement the desired behavior of not auto-selecting assessments by default, aligning with the PR objectives. The changes should improve user experience by allowing for more selective importing of assessments.

Key points:

  1. The checkbox is now unchecked by default.
  2. A new class has been added to the label, potentially for styling or JS interactions.
  3. Existing "Select All" and "Unselect All" buttons provide flexibility for users.

Ensure to address the minor accessibility suggestion and verify the JavaScript functionality as mentioned in the previous comments.


Line range hint 1-80: Verify JavaScript functionality with the new default state

The changes to the checkbox default state are correct. However, to ensure full compatibility:

Please verify that the JavaScript functions, particularly those related to the "Select All" and "Unselect All" buttons, work correctly with the new default unchecked state of the checkboxes.

Run the following script to locate relevant JavaScript files:

Review the output files to ensure they handle the new default state correctly.

Copy link
Contributor

@KesterTan KesterTan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Otherwise LGTM though 👍

@jlge jlge enabled auto-merge October 25, 2024 20:34
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b4d21ba and 3ab08a7.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • app/assets/stylesheets/install_assessment.css.scss (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
app/assets/stylesheets/install_assessment.css.scss (1)

22-25: LGTM! Clean and focused styling for assessment checkboxes.

The new .assessment-checkbox class provides proper centering for checkboxes using flexbox, which aligns well with the PR's objective of improving the assessment installation interface. The implementation follows good CSS practices and maintains consistency with the existing styling patterns.

@jlge jlge added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 25, 2024
Merged via the queue into master with commit a337964 Oct 25, 2024
6 checks passed
@jlge jlge deleted the joanna-uncheck-uninstalled-assessments branch October 25, 2024 20:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

When installing existing assessment, don't autoselect all
2 participants