[Docs] Combined initial documentation work #121
Conversation
| // | ||
| // This source file is part of the Swift OpenTelemetry open source project | ||
| // | ||
| // Copyright (c) 2021 Moritz Lang and the Swift OpenTelemetry project authors |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Authorship I believe you'd be fine with the samples using this repo's copyright @slashmo ?
I'll change that in a bit
Update Samples/Dinner/docker/collector-config.yaml Co-authored-by: Moritz Lang <[email protected]> minor cleanup wip
**Motivation:** Since modifying an attribute needs to hit a lock this pattern is more efficient
**Motivation:** This type will be deprecated as soon as possible and only serves as a bridge for Swift 5.6 adopters.
| swift run -c release | ||
| ``` | ||
|
|
||
| Refer to the "Trace Your Application" guide in the documentation to learn more about how to interpret this sample. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Could this link to "Trace Your Application" guide directly from here?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Heh actually such link is not possible unless as a <a href... I can do those later, I don't know the URL to point to unless we have something published on the package index.
Co-authored-by: Max Desiatov <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Yim Lee <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I went through part of the application example and ran into the fact that it seems like the example is already the parallelized trace, despite what the docs suggest. Is that expected? It seems like it might be nice to have it be able to produce both kinds of traces so that someone following the tutorial can actually explore the comparison features, etc.
| > ``` | ||
| > | ||
| > - Zipkin UI URL: http://localhost:9411/ | ||
| > - Jaeger UI URL: ... |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This space unintentionally left blank? Partially duplicates the content above, but also this is the spot where I looked.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks I'll remove those - here, we mention it above right
Samples/Dinner/Package.swift
Outdated
| let package = Package( | ||
| name: "onboarding", | ||
| platforms: [ | ||
| .macOS("14.0.0"), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Should this really be 14.0.0? I adjusted this to 13.0.0 so I could run it and it worked fine.
**Motivation:** This type will be deprecated as soon as possible and only serves as a bridge for Swift 5.6 adopters.
|
I take the few minor comments as overall approval, thanks folks! |
Co-authored-by: Cassie Jones <[email protected]>
I think that's off and I'll follow up on that, thank you @porglezomp ! #124 |
| } | ||
|
|
||
| func chopVegetables() async throws -> [Vegetable] { | ||
| try await otelChopping1.tracer().withSpan("chopVegetables") { _ in |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I know I'm coming in late, but how come this is explicitly referencing otelChopping1?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Just to mock a multi node trace in one process. I'll make an actual multi process example soon to complement this with more "normal" usage
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh, got it. That wasn't explicitly clear when looking at this example what it was actually demonstrating
|
|
||
| `Instrument` has two requirements: | ||
|
|
||
| 1. An `Instrument/extract(_:into:using:)` method, which extracts values from a generic carrier (e.g. HTTP headers) and store them into a `Baggage` instance |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I'm assuming this is referenced this way, so that when cross-module symbols are able to be referenced by DocC, we can just come back and add the 2nd set of `?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yeah currently we can't cross link so it's just a code marker. I may go around and make them explicit links manually hmm
| @@ -27,4 +26,4 @@ | |||
| ## | |||
| ##===----------------------------------------------------------------------===## | |||
|
|
|||
| swift package --disable-sandbox preview-documentation --target $1 | |||
| xcrun swift package --disable-sandbox preview-documentation --target Tracing | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
What would be the alternative? Is there a portable way to pick up the currently selected toolchain? I don't think non-Darwin platforms even allow something like that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Platform checks to determine if it should be prefixed with xcrun
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Potentially, I'm not sure if the intention was to create a script that runs purely on macOS CI.
Replaces #69
Resolves #80