-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update arrow/parquet to arrow/parquet 53.3.0
#13508
Conversation
Why is CI forced to run in arrow 53.3 🤔 ? |
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Signed-off-by: jayzhan211 <[email protected]>
I push the fix since this is blocking CI. Since #13291 looks like in discussion, so I fix up the |
Thanks @alamb @jayzhan211 |
It seems that CI uses the latest version of dependencies that are semver compatible |
My thinking was that explicitly using arrow 53.3 will ensure that any bugs we fix that rely on arrow 53.3 features will work correctly. If we don't update DataFusion to explicitly use 53.3.0 in Cargo.toml, CI will run (and use 53.3.0) but other projects with DataFusion could potentially use 53.2.0. If we add code to DataFusion that relies on 53.3.0 (like some of the |
Thanks @jayzhan211 |
@@ -39,8 +39,19 @@ drop table test_source | |||
|
|||
# TODO: Revisit this issue after upgrading to the arrow-rs version that includes apache/arrow-rs#6671. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This became now addressable - #13538
Which issue does this PR close?
53.3.0
(November 2024) arrow-rs#6597Rationale for this change
There are some other fixes waiting on this arrow release so let's get them integrated into DataFusion
What changes are included in this PR?
Update to latest arrow/parquet
Are these changes tested?
By CI
Are there any user-facing changes?