Remove HDFS support ... #1073
Merged
Remove HDFS support ... #1073
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
github-actions
bot
added
the
documentation
22 tasks
andygrove
reviewed
Oct 11, 2024
milenkovicm
force-pushed
the
reloaded_remove_hdfs
branch
from
befdc6d
to
393a9a7
Compare
|
I will merge this once the changes to the changelog have been reverted. |
|
I thought I've reverted it, will have look later, sorry |
... the crate used need some love, and there are is newer crate as well.
milenkovicm
force-pushed
the
reloaded_remove_hdfs
branch
from
393a9a7
to
9d9d59b
Compare
|
It should be ok now. In my defence I say I was looking at your comment before my first daily coffee 😀 |
andygrove
approved these changes
Oct 12, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
... object store creation to be revisited
As part of effort outlined in #1066 and #1067 this PR removes HDFS support.
Relates to: #1066 & #1067
Which issue does this PR close?
Closes #.
Rationale for this change
What changes are included in this PR?
Are there any user-facing changes?