-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Remove the iterative verifier #139
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
9a238c6
to
176cddf
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. A couple grammatical nitpicks 😄
docs/source/verifiers.rst
Outdated
|Mechanism | ``CHECKSUM TABLE`` | Verify row before cutover; | | ||
| | | Reverify changed rows during| | ||
| | | cutover. | | ||
|Mechanism | ``CHECKSUM TABLE`` | Each row is validated via a | |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: s/a/an/ MD5 type query
docs/source/verifiers.rst
Outdated
InlineVerifier | ||
-------------- | ||
|
||
Ghostferry's core algorithm has ran for millions of times and is backed by a |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nit: s/ran/run
includes: floating point values and datetime columns. | ||
|
||
The InlineVerifier is designed to catch these type of problems and fail the | ||
run if discrepencies are detected. **It is not designed to verify that certain |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good call out 👍
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can you comment on deleted tests whether there's equivalent tests for them since you're most familiar with the newer tests? That would really expedite this review
GhostferryUnitTestSuite: &testhelpers.GhostferryUnitTestSuite{}, | ||
}, | ||
}) | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
do we have replacement for these tests?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes. I'll comment what happened to each test inline.
@@ -1,118 +0,0 @@ | |||
package test |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Replaced in test/integration/inline_verifier_test.rb:
ghostferry/test/integration/inline_verifier_test.rb
Lines 242 to 264 in b8147c5
################### | |
# Collation Tests # | |
################### | |
def test_ascii_data_from_utfmb3_to_utfmb4 | |
run_collation_test(ASCIIDATA, "utf8mb3", "utf8mb4", identical: true) | |
end | |
def test_ascii_data_from_utfmb4_to_utfmb3 | |
run_collation_test(ASCIIDATA, "utf8mb4", "utf8mb3", identical: true) | |
end | |
def test_utfmb3_data_from_utfmb3_to_utfmb4 | |
run_collation_test(UTF8MB3DATA, "utf8mb3", "utf8mb4", identical: true) | |
end | |
def test_utfmb3_data_from_utfmb4_to_utfmb3 | |
run_collation_test(UTF8MB3DATA, "utf8mb4", "utf8mb3", identical: true) | |
end | |
def test_utfmb4_data_from_utfmb4_to_utfmb3 | |
run_collation_test(UTF8MB4DATA, "utf8mb4", "utf8mb3", identical: false) | |
end |
"github.com/stretchr/testify/assert" | ||
) | ||
|
||
func TestHashesSql(t *testing.T) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ghostferry/test/go/table_schema_cache_test.go
Lines 141 to 169 in b8147c5
func (this *TableSchemaCacheTestSuite) TestFingerprintQuery() { | |
tableSchemaCache, err := ghostferry.LoadTables(this.Ferry.SourceDB, this.tableFilter, nil, nil) | |
this.Require().Nil(err) | |
tables := tableSchemaCache.AsSlice() | |
table := tables[0] | |
query := table.FingerprintQuery("s", "t", 10) | |
this.Require().Equal("SELECT `id`,MD5(CONCAT(MD5(COALESCE(`id`, 'NULL_PBj}b]74P@JTo$5G_null')),MD5(COALESCE(`data`, 'NULL_PBj}b]74P@JTo$5G_null')))) AS __ghostferry_row_md5 FROM `s`.`t` WHERE `id` IN (?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?)", query) | |
table = tables[1] | |
table.CompressedColumnsForVerification = map[string]string{"data": "SNAPPY"} | |
query = table.FingerprintQuery("s", "t", 10) | |
this.Require().Equal("SELECT `id`,MD5(CONCAT(MD5(COALESCE(`id`, 'NULL_PBj}b]74P@JTo$5G_null')))) AS __ghostferry_row_md5,`data` FROM `s`.`t` WHERE `id` IN (?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?,?)", query) | |
} | |
func (this *TableSchemaCacheTestSuite) TestTableRowMd5Query() { | |
tableSchemaCache, err := ghostferry.LoadTables(this.Ferry.SourceDB, this.tableFilter, nil, nil) | |
this.Require().Nil(err) | |
tables := tableSchemaCache.AsSlice() | |
table := tables[0] | |
query := table.RowMd5Query() | |
this.Require().Equal("MD5(CONCAT(MD5(COALESCE(`id`, 'NULL_PBj}b]74P@JTo$5G_null')),MD5(COALESCE(`data`, 'NULL_PBj}b]74P@JTo$5G_null')))) AS __ghostferry_row_md5", query) | |
table = tables[1] | |
table.CompressedColumnsForVerification = map[string]string{"data": "SNAPPY"} | |
query = table.RowMd5Query() | |
this.Require().Equal("MD5(CONCAT(MD5(COALESCE(`id`, 'NULL_PBj}b]74P@JTo$5G_null')))) AS __ghostferry_row_md5", query) | |
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've commented on all the tests. Some thoughts:
- The IterativeVerifier used the Go integration test framework which is deprecated and less powerful. The tests also abuse the fact that the verification only emit an error after cutover. Therefore, a 1:1 mapping of tests are not feasible. The Ruby integration tests with the corrupting triggers covers all the cases tho.
- IgnoreColumn and CompressedData are covered multiple times within the IterativeVerifier test (integration AND unit). I think covering them once in the integration test is enough.
- Due to the Go integration tests being somewhat clunky, there are a lot more unit tests for the IterativeVerifier than the InlineVerifier. The most important one of these are the tests that actually asserts the MD5 fingerprints. I think there are some value in asserting the fingerprints themselves to prevent regressions, so I'll create a follow up PR to add these tests back as it is not very easy to add them back.
- I'm missing some tests in the ReverifyStore behaviour. The behaviour has changed a bit since we're constantly reverifying, so the tests won't look the same. I'll add these tests in a follow up PR, but there won't be an 1:1 correspondence.
- I'm missing a successful run InlineVerifier test that I'll add in a follow up PR.
- MaxExpectedDowntime is no longer tested. Possible unit test addition in a follow up PR.
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
func TestVerificationFailsDeletedRow(t *testing.T) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This test tests if a row within the reverifyStore will be detected during cutover if it was deleted on the target.
The InlineVerifier test that effectively covers this case is when the test corrupts a BinlogStreamer insert and the InlineVerifier detect it during the cutover:
ghostferry/test/integration/inline_verifier_test.rb
Lines 115 to 138 in b8147c5
def test_catches_binlog_streamer_corruption | |
seed_random_data(source_db, number_of_rows: 1) | |
seed_random_data(target_db, number_of_rows: 0) | |
result = source_db.query("SELECT id FROM #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME} LIMIT 1") | |
corrupting_id = result.first["id"] + 1 | |
enable_corrupting_insert_trigger(corrupting_id) | |
ghostferry = new_ghostferry(MINIMAL_GHOSTFERRY, config: { verifier_type: "Inline" }) | |
ghostferry.on_status(Ghostferry::Status::ROW_COPY_COMPLETED) do | |
source_db.query("INSERT INTO #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME} (id, data) VALUES (#{corrupting_id}, 'data')") | |
end | |
verification_ran = false | |
ghostferry.on_status(Ghostferry::Status::VERIFIED) do |*incorrect_tables| | |
verification_ran = true | |
assert_equal ["gftest.test_table_1"], incorrect_tables | |
end | |
ghostferry.run | |
assert verification_ran | |
assert_equal "cutover verification failed for: gftest.test_table_1 [pks: #{corrupting_id} ] ", ghostferry.error_lines.last["msg"] | |
end |
assert.True(t, ran) | ||
} | ||
|
||
func TestVerificationFailsUpdatedRow(t *testing.T) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is basically the same as TestVerificationFailsDeletedRow
, which is covered by the same case.
assert.True(t, ran) | ||
} | ||
|
||
func TestIgnoresColumns(t *testing.T) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Covered by:
ghostferry/test/integration/inline_verifier_test.rb
Lines 80 to 113 in b8147c5
def test_different_data_in_ignored_column_passes_inline_verification | |
[source_db, target_db].each do |db| | |
db.query("CREATE DATABASE IF NOT EXISTS #{DEFAULT_DB}") | |
db.query("CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME} (id bigint(20) not null auto_increment, data VARCHAR(255), data2 VARCHAR(255), primary key(id))") | |
end | |
source_db.prepare("INSERT INTO #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME} (id, data, data2) VALUES (?, ?, ?)").execute(1, "data1", "same") | |
target_db.prepare("INSERT INTO #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME} (id, data, data2) VALUES (?, ?, ?)").execute(1, "data2", "same") | |
ghostferry = new_ghostferry(MINIMAL_GHOSTFERRY, config: { verifier_type: "Inline", ignored_column: "data" }) | |
ghostferry.on_status(Ghostferry::Status::ROW_COPY_COMPLETED) do | |
source_db.query("UPDATE #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME} SET data = 'data3' WHERE id = 1") | |
end | |
ghostferry.run | |
assert_nil ghostferry.error | |
rows = source_db.query("SELECT * FROM #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME}") | |
assert_equal 1, rows.count | |
rows.each do |row| | |
assert_equal 1, row["id"] | |
assert_equal "data3", row["data"] | |
assert_equal "same", row["data2"] | |
end | |
rows = target_db.query("SELECT * FROM #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME}") | |
assert_equal 1, rows.count | |
rows.each do |row| | |
assert_equal 1, row["id"] | |
assert_equal "data2", row["data"] | |
assert_equal "same", row["data2"] | |
end | |
end |
assert.True(t, ran) | ||
} | ||
|
||
func TestIgnoresTables(t *testing.T) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not applicable. The InlineVerifier just follows the table filter as configured globally for Ghostferry. Any tables not loaded into the TableSchemaCache will not be verified.
assert.True(t, ran) | ||
} | ||
|
||
func TestVerificationPasses(t *testing.T) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Need to add a test for this.
t.Require().NotEqual(hashes[0], hashes[1]) | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (t *IterativeVerifierTestSuite) TestPositiveAndNegativeZeroFloat() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ghostferry/test/integration/inline_verifier_test.rb
Lines 144 to 177 in b8147c5
def test_positive_negative_zero | |
[source_db, target_db].each do |db| | |
seed_random_data(db, number_of_rows: 0) | |
db.query("ALTER TABLE #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME} MODIFY data FLOAT") | |
end | |
# If the data already exists on the target, Ghostferry's INSERT IGNORE will | |
# not insert again. However, the verifier should run. | |
# We first set the values to be different to ensure the InlineVerifier is | |
# indeed running as the nominal case (comparing 0.0 and -0.0) should not | |
# emit any error and thus we cannot say for certain if the InlineVerifier | |
# ran or not. | |
source_db.query("INSERT INTO #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME} VALUES (1, 0.0)") | |
target_db.query("INSERT INTO #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME} VALUES (1, 1.0)") | |
ghostferry = new_ghostferry(MINIMAL_GHOSTFERRY, config: { verifier_type: "Inline" }) | |
ghostferry.run_expecting_interrupt | |
refute_nil ghostferry.error | |
err_msg = ghostferry.error["ErrMessage"] | |
assert err_msg.include?("row fingerprints for pks [1] on #{DEFAULT_DB}.#{DEFAULT_TABLE} do not match"), message: err_msg | |
# Now we run the real test case. | |
target_db.query("UPDATE #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME} SET data = -0.0 WHERE id = 1") | |
verification_ran = false | |
ghostferry = new_ghostferry(MINIMAL_GHOSTFERRY, config: { verifier_type: "Inline" }) | |
ghostferry.on_status(Ghostferry::Status::VERIFIED) do |*incorrect_tables| | |
verification_ran = true | |
assert_equal [], incorrect_tables | |
end | |
ghostferry.run | |
assert verification_ran | |
end |
t.Require().NotEqual(neg, pos) | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (t *IterativeVerifierTestSuite) TestNULLValues() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
ghostferry/test/integration/inline_verifier_test.rb
Lines 179 to 240 in b8147c5
def test_null_vs_null | |
seed_random_data(source_db, number_of_rows: 0) | |
seed_random_data(target_db, number_of_rows: 0) | |
source_db.query("INSERT INTO #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME} VALUES (1, NULL)") | |
target_db.query("INSERT INTO #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME} VALUES (1, NULL)") | |
verification_ran = false | |
ghostferry = new_ghostferry(MINIMAL_GHOSTFERRY, config: { verifier_type: "Inline" }) | |
ghostferry.on_status(Ghostferry::Status::VERIFIED) do |*incorrect_tables| | |
verification_ran = true | |
assert_equal [], incorrect_tables | |
end | |
ghostferry.run | |
assert verification_ran | |
end | |
def test_null_vs_empty_string | |
seed_random_data(source_db, number_of_rows: 0) | |
seed_random_data(target_db, number_of_rows: 0) | |
source_db.query("INSERT INTO #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME} VALUES (1, NULL)") | |
target_db.query("INSERT INTO #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME} VALUES (1, '')") | |
ghostferry = new_ghostferry(MINIMAL_GHOSTFERRY, config: { verifier_type: "Inline" }) | |
ghostferry.run_expecting_interrupt | |
refute_nil ghostferry.error | |
err_msg = ghostferry.error["ErrMessage"] | |
assert err_msg.include?("row fingerprints for pks [1] on #{DEFAULT_DB}.#{DEFAULT_TABLE} do not match"), message: err_msg | |
end | |
def test_null_vs_null_string | |
seed_random_data(source_db, number_of_rows: 0) | |
seed_random_data(target_db, number_of_rows: 0) | |
source_db.query("INSERT INTO #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME} VALUES (1, NULL)") | |
target_db.query("INSERT INTO #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME} VALUES (1, 'NULL')") | |
ghostferry = new_ghostferry(MINIMAL_GHOSTFERRY, config: { verifier_type: "Inline" }) | |
ghostferry.run_expecting_interrupt | |
refute_nil ghostferry.error | |
err_msg = ghostferry.error["ErrMessage"] | |
assert err_msg.include?("row fingerprints for pks [1] on #{DEFAULT_DB}.#{DEFAULT_TABLE} do not match"), message: err_msg | |
end | |
def test_null_in_different_order | |
seed_random_data(source_db, number_of_rows: 0) | |
seed_random_data(target_db, number_of_rows: 0) | |
source_db.query("ALTER TABLE #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME} ADD COLUMN data2 VARCHAR(255) AFTER data") | |
target_db.query("ALTER TABLE #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME} ADD COLUMN data2 VARCHAR(255) AFTER data") | |
source_db.query("INSERT INTO #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME} VALUES (1, NULL, 'data')") | |
target_db.query("INSERT INTO #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME} VALUES (1, 'data', NULL)") | |
ghostferry = new_ghostferry(MINIMAL_GHOSTFERRY, config: { verifier_type: "Inline" }) | |
ghostferry.run_expecting_interrupt | |
refute_nil ghostferry.error | |
err_msg = ghostferry.error["ErrMessage"] | |
assert err_msg.include?("row fingerprints for pks [1] on #{DEFAULT_DB}.#{DEFAULT_TABLE} do not match"), message: err_msg | |
end |
) | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (t *ReverifyStoreTestSuite) TestFlushAndBatchByTableWillCreateReverifyBatchesAndClearTheMapStore() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The way ReverifyStore works changed. Can add some unit tests in a follow up.
t.store = ghostferry.NewReverifyStore() | ||
} | ||
|
||
func (t *ReverifyStoreTestSuite) TestAddEntryIntoReverifyStoreWillDeduplicate() { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The way ReverifyStore works changed. Can add some unit tests in a follow up.
assert_test_table_is_identical | ||
end | ||
|
||
def test_iterative_verifier_fails_if_binlog_streamer_incorrectly_copies_data |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is simply a ported test from the Go integration test to the ruby integration test when the ruby code was first created, thus why it is redundant.
ghostferry/test/integration/inline_verifier_test.rb
Lines 115 to 138 in b8147c5
def test_catches_binlog_streamer_corruption | |
seed_random_data(source_db, number_of_rows: 1) | |
seed_random_data(target_db, number_of_rows: 0) | |
result = source_db.query("SELECT id FROM #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME} LIMIT 1") | |
corrupting_id = result.first["id"] + 1 | |
enable_corrupting_insert_trigger(corrupting_id) | |
ghostferry = new_ghostferry(MINIMAL_GHOSTFERRY, config: { verifier_type: "Inline" }) | |
ghostferry.on_status(Ghostferry::Status::ROW_COPY_COMPLETED) do | |
source_db.query("INSERT INTO #{DEFAULT_FULL_TABLE_NAME} (id, data) VALUES (#{corrupting_id}, 'data')") | |
end | |
verification_ran = false | |
ghostferry.on_status(Ghostferry::Status::VERIFIED) do |*incorrect_tables| | |
verification_ran = true | |
assert_equal ["gftest.test_table_1"], incorrect_tables | |
end | |
ghostferry.run | |
assert verification_ran | |
assert_equal "cutover verification failed for: gftest.test_table_1 [pks: #{corrupting_id} ] ", ghostferry.error_lines.last["msg"] | |
end |
@shuhaowu sorry for the delay, but it will probably be after BFCM before we/Hormoz have a chance to review this. |
The InlineVerifier supercedes this code. This should eliminate a lot of confusion.
Also updated the documentation to refer to the InlineVerifier only.