Be more forgiving when parsing IDs in service networks_values

[sk4zuzu]

Community Note

• Please vote on this issue by adding a 👍 reaction to the original issue to help the community and maintainers prioritize this request
• Please do not leave "+1" or other comments that do not add relevant new information or questions, they generate extra noise for PR followers and do not help prioritize the request

Description

GOCA defines networks_values as:

NetworksVals    []map[string]interface{} `json:"networks_values,omitempty"`

which as unspecified as it could be allows for both numeric and string network IDs.

This PR makes the following snippet work:

resource "opennebula_service" "service" {
  name = "service"

  template_id = opennebula_service_template.service.id

  extra_template = jsonencode({
      networks_values = [
        { service = { id = data.opennebula_virtual_network.service.id } },
        { private = { id = tonumber(opennebula_virtual_network.reservation.id) } },
      ]
  })
}

References

#000

New or Affected Resource(s)

• opennebula_service

Checklist

• I have created an issue and I have mentioned it in References
• My code follows the style guidelines of this project (use go fmt)
• My changes generate no new warnings or errors
• I have updated the unit tests and they pass succesfuly
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have updated the documentation (if needed)
• I have updated the changelog file