Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add new test cases for server-based sanitization against reflected XSS #173

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

shivababuh
Copy link

6 new test cases were added to demonstrate proper (and improper) sanitization of reflected user input against XSS. The tainted user input is reflected in an HTML attribute (2 cases), in an HTML tag (2 cases), and directly in an inner HTML text (2 cases). For each of the reflected locations, one case provides proper sanitization that prevents exploitation, while another provides inadequate sanitization resulting in reflected XSS

shivababuh and others added 5 commits September 8, 2021 09:47
* New XML Format post 10.x release

* take care of xpath issues
* XSS Scenarios

* xss mods

* review comments incorporated

* Renamed Intermediate class & removed the commented out code

Co-authored-by: user <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: gituser <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: kaveti.l <[email protected]>
* XSS Scenarios

* xss mods

* review comments incorporated

* scripts to create several SAST reports

* Update AppScanDynamicReader2.java per pull request OWASP-Benchmark#157, with additional changes by me, including running spotless properly.

* Update codeql-analysis.yml

CodeQL auto build is failing with a "Picked up JAVA_TOOL_OPTIONS:..." message, so let's try a plain old Maven build.

* Update codeql-analysis.yml

Ensure that the CodeQL workflow checks out enough git history to support the spotless ratchetFrom test in the Maven build.

* Update README.md

Trivial grammar fix.

* Renamed Intermediate class & removed the commented out code

* change horusec to docker

* prevent installation outputs

* insider - check for availability and updates

* use docker instead of calling semgrep directly

* require docker

* fix typo

* Upgrade a bunch of dependencies and remove a few unused ones.

* fix insider installation check 🙈

* execute bit for docker script

* more preconditions checks

* store sonarqube credentials in seperate file

* prevent adding of sonarqube credentials

* docker cleanup

* Revert "docker cleanup"

This reverts commit 70e7c48.

* docker cleanup

* Add dependency used by a script. Minor tweaks to a few scripts.

* A few minor fixes to the other IAST run scripts.

* This is a MAJOR change. This commit rips out all the utilities included with Benchmark to score it, run crawlers on it, etc. Those utilities are now in a seperate project called BenchmarkUtils. BenchmarkUtils produces a maven plugin that is now used by all the scoring and crawling scripts updated in this commit. You have to clone BenchmarkUtils, then run: mvn install, to get the plugin (which is built and installed locally).

* Proxy Settings added to OWASP Benchmark Crawler to enable different hosts (#1)

* Simplify configuration of 2 config files. Minor updates to a number of test cases.

* Updated the Dockerfile to reflect the repo change to BenchmarkJava

* Fix utility method so more 'standard' headers are filtered out when trying to identify the custom header for test cases that use that.

* Intermediate file is deleted

Co-authored-by: user <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: gituser <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: kaveti.l <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sascha Knoop <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Dave Wichers <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: dandersonaspect <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Arun Muthu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Arun Muthu <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: shivababuh <[email protected]>
@davewichers
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for submitting these. However, the Benchmark is synthetically generated, not built by hand like this. With that said, I'll review these improvements and see which of them I can roll into the generator so they are included in Benchmark 1.3, which is getting close to ready for release. So the timing of your contribution is good on that score.

@PyaeHlianMoe
Copy link

Hi @davewichers I know this thread is pretty old. Do you know when the v1.3 will be released?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants