-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 253
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Added extra context in the nested string interpolation example #1070
Conversation
…e the string + operator was not previously introduced
Yeah the tutorial is deliberately not going into depth about operators, because they're largely unsurprising -- except of course for string/path concatenation. Thanks for pointing it out. Instead of prefixing the note, Could you please do that? If not, I'll keep a reminder to finish it up. |
Yes I'd be happy to but won't get to it until Monday. Hope that's ok! |
…e because the string + operator was not previously introduced" This reverts commit 2648f98.
…ngs as operators have no yet been mentioned. link to manual for more operators
I've moved it to a detailed explanation block and added a little more detail. Also linked to manual and the functional libraries section because standard operators and functions are mentioned there. Let me know if this is ok. Thank you! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks a lot @ellyxir. This prompted me to fix a small discoverability issue in the Nix manual.
I expanded a bit on the explanation.
…t derivations are
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
the string + operator was not previously introduced and it wasn't clear that you can have more than just a variable within ${}
im doing a video series for learning the nix programming language and when i saw this part of the language tutorial, i had a hard time parsing what i was seeing. perhaps this could make it more clear. thank you!