Light update #37
Merged
Light update #37
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…to the image_records table.
…e ImageRecord, but if a session is provided, that will override.
…e taking a lot of time to run, but left them in there, just in case we want to run them again sometime.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New understanding of light state data means that we can rely on the values in the image header to
determine what lights were on during an image without having to independently check the light
telemetry.
As such, the ImageRecord was updated and the logic of create_raw.py was, too.
Types of changes
Checklist:
Licensing:
This project is released under the LICENSE.