Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix error in parallelization scheme #4760

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 25, 2024

Conversation

marinegor
Copy link
Contributor

@marinegor marinegor commented Oct 24, 2024

Changes made in this Pull Request:

PR Checklist

  • Tests?
  • Docs?
  • CHANGELOG updated?
  • Issue raised/referenced?

Developers certificate of origin


📚 Documentation preview 📚: https://mdanalysis--4760.org.readthedocs.build/en/4760/

@marinegor marinegor changed the title Update docs Fix error in parallelization scheme Oct 24, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 24, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.63%. Comparing base (d2729f7) to head (ca9c452).
Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           develop    #4760      +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage    93.65%   93.63%   -0.03%     
===========================================
  Files          175      187      +12     
  Lines        21565    22640    +1075     
  Branches      3023     3024       +1     
===========================================
+ Hits         20196    21198    +1002     
- Misses         925      998      +73     
  Partials       444      444              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Member

@orbeckst orbeckst left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good fixes to the docs. Important for anyone wanting to work with parallelization.

@IAlibay this is not a new feature but a docs bug fix. Can this go in despite feature freeze?

@@ -41,7 +41,8 @@ impossible with any but the ``serial`` backend.

Parallelization is getting added to existing analysis classes. Initially,
only :class:`MDAnalysis.analysis.rms.RMSD` supports parallel analysis, but
we aim to increase support in future releases.
we aim to increase support in future releases. Please check issues labeled
`parallelization` on the MDAnalysis issues [page](https://github.com/MDAnalysis/mdanalysis/issues).
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@orbeckst
Copy link
Member

@IAlibay I assigned the PR to you so you can make the decision about merging despite 2.8.0 feature freeze.

@orbeckst orbeckst self-assigned this Oct 24, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@yuxuanzhuang yuxuanzhuang left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks! lgtm!

Copy link
Member

@IAlibay IAlibay left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I went ahead and fixed the link so we can merge more rapidly.

@IAlibay IAlibay merged commit 78dda9b into MDAnalysis:develop Oct 25, 2024
16 of 24 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants