Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add bdt_disc flag, correct GloParT-v2 mass #232

Merged
merged 26 commits into from
Nov 21, 2024
Merged

add bdt_disc flag, correct GloParT-v2 mass #232

merged 26 commits into from
Nov 21, 2024

Conversation

jmduarte
Copy link
Member

@jmduarte jmduarte commented Nov 7, 2024

  • add bdt_disc flag to PostProcess.py. If True, uses current behavior of defining BDT_ggF/VBF = P_ggF/VBF / (P_ggF/VBF + P_bkg). If false, just uses P_ggF/VBF directly. Defaults to True. This seems to behave weird though, so I am not using it now.
  • correct GloParT-v2 mass in load_run3_samples
  • implement JMR/JMS systematics measured using morphing methods
  • implement coarse-binned TXbb scale factors (https://run3-hbb-glopart-calib.web.cern.ch/20241009_bb_GloParTXbbVsQCD_freezeSFs_trial20241011_2022/4_fit/)
  • use dummy systematic for ttbar TXbb (1 ± 3%) and ttbar BDT scale factors (1 ± 30%)

@jmduarte jmduarte changed the title add bdt_disc flag to PostProcess.py add bdt_disc flag, correct GloParT-v2 mass Nov 7, 2024
@cmantill
Copy link
Contributor

@jmduarte things look good to me. Can you post here the command to test postprocess.py and datacards?

@jmduarte
Copy link
Member Author

@cmantill cmantill merged commit 0c16deb into main Nov 21, 2024
8 checks passed
@cmantill cmantill deleted the bdt_disc branch November 21, 2024 21:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants