Test benchmarks from forks

[andreasnoack]

No description provided.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.90%. Comparing base (e905c08) to head (eaa37a9).
Report is 12 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #96   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.90%   85.90%           
=======================================
  Files           2        2           
  Lines         220      220           
=======================================
  Hits          189      189           
  Misses         31       31           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[andreasnoack]

@palday I've browsed the GitHub Actions documentation and I don't see a way to allow PRs from forks be allowed to write a comment on the PR with the results. Any ideas?

[palday]

Hmmm, we may want to have the output just included in a normal CI log that we then have to click on, like test outputs. We could also have the job pass/fail based on some liberal threshold for non-worsening performance. Liberal because benchmarking, especially on CI, tends to be very noisy.