Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix error display modal #632

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2024
Merged

fix error display modal #632

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2024

Conversation

chiragchhatrala
Copy link
Collaborator

@chiragchhatrala chiragchhatrala commented Nov 26, 2024

Fixed #629

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling for form validation responses in the FormEditor component, enhancing clarity of error messages displayed to users.
  • Style

    • Updated the header color for error messages in the FormErrorModal component for better visibility.
  • Refactor

    • Changed the data source for error messages from form to validationErrorResponse in the FormErrorModal component for more accurate error reporting.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 26, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces changes to the error handling logic within the FormEditor and FormErrorModal components. Specifically, it updates the way validation error responses are accessed, shifting from error.response.data to error.data. The FormErrorModal component now uses a prop named validationErrorResponse instead of form for managing error data. These modifications ensure that error messages are displayed correctly, reflecting the new structure of the error data.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
client/components/open/forms/components/FormEditor.vue Updated error handling in saveFormEdit and saveFormCreate methods to access validation errors via error.data. Maintained overall structure and logic.
client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormErrorModal.vue Changed error message display logic to use validationErrorResponse prop instead of form. Updated header color for error messages.

Assessment against linked issues

Objective Addressed Explanation
Fix 500 code error when editing a form (#629)

Possibly related PRs

  • 55919 form editor error boundary #494: The changes in FormEditor.vue and FormErrorModal.vue are related as both involve modifications to error handling and the structure of error data management, specifically transitioning to using validationErrorResponse.
  • 42772 condition editor error handling #502: The FormEditor.vue component is also modified in this PR, which includes the addition of error handling logic that complements the changes made in the main PR regarding how errors are processed and displayed.
  • [ESC-365] = on fetch submission data display error if there #608: This PR enhances error handling in the OpenForm.vue component, which is relevant as it aligns with the overall theme of improving error management across form components, similar to the changes in the main PR.

Suggested reviewers

  • JhumanJ

🐇 In the meadow, where bunnies play,
I fixed the errors, hip-hip-hooray!
With colors bright and messages clear,
Forms now save without any fear!
So hop along, let’s cheer and prance,
For smoother edits, give it a chance! 🌼


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormErrorModal.vue (2)

12-12: Consider adding a default prop value for validationErrorResponse

The error display logic looks good, but could be more robust with a default value for the validationErrorResponse prop.

Add a default value to prevent potential undefined errors:

   props: {
     show: { type: Boolean, required: true },
-    validationErrorResponse: { type: Object, required: false },
+    validationErrorResponse: { 
+      type: Object,
+      required: false,
+      default: () => ({ message: '', errors: {} })
+    },
   },

Also applies to: 16-17, 21-21


Line range hint 1-52: Architectural feedback on error handling approach

The changes improve error handling by making it more explicit and focused. However, consider these additional improvements for robust error handling:

  1. Add error type differentiation (validation vs server errors)
  2. Include error logging for non-validation errors
  3. Consider adding retry capability for transient server errors

Would you like me to provide implementation examples for any of these suggestions?

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1224b89 and 3009cc0.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • client/components/open/forms/components/FormEditor.vue (2 hunks)
  • client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormErrorModal.vue (2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormErrorModal.vue (2)

7-7: LGTM! Improved error message visibility

The darker red shade (text-red-600) provides better contrast and readability for the error message header.


44-44: Verify the prop name change across the codebase

The component changes look good. The explicit component name and more descriptive prop name improve code clarity.

Let's verify all usages of this component have been updated:

Also applies to: 47-47

✅ Verification successful

All usages of FormErrorModal have been updated correctly

The verification shows that the only usage of FormErrorModal component is in FormEditor.vue, and it's already using the new prop name validation-error-response instead of the old form prop. No further changes are needed.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any instances where FormErrorModal is used with the old 'form' prop
rg -l 'FormErrorModal.*form=' client/

# Search for all FormErrorModal usage to ensure we haven't missed any
rg -A 5 '<FormErrorModal' client/

Length of output: 575

client/components/open/forms/components/FormEditor.vue (1)

Line range hint 262-315: Verify error handling changes across the application

The change from error.response.data to error.data might affect other components that expect the old error structure.

Let's verify the error handling pattern across the codebase:

@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@ export default {
})
.catch((error) => {
if (error?.response?.status === 422) {
this.validationErrorResponse = error.response.data
this.validationErrorResponse = error.data
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Add defensive error handling

The direct access to error.data might cause issues if the error object structure is different than expected.

Consider adding defensive checks:

-            this.validationErrorResponse = error.data
+            this.validationErrorResponse = error?.data || { message: 'Validation failed', errors: {} }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
this.validationErrorResponse = error.data
this.validationErrorResponse = error?.data || { message: 'Validation failed', errors: {} }

@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@
})
.catch((error) => {
if (error?.response?.status === 422) {
this.validationErrorResponse = error.response
this.validationErrorResponse = error.data
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

DRY: Extract duplicated error handling logic

The error handling logic is duplicated between saveFormEdit and saveFormCreate methods.

Consider extracting the common error handling logic into a separate method:

+ handleFormError(error) {
+   if (error?.response?.status === 422) {
+     this.validationErrorResponse = error?.data || { message: 'Validation failed', errors: {} }
+     this.showValidationErrors()
+   } else {
+     useAlert().error(
+       "An error occurred while saving the form, please try again.",
+     )
+     captureException(error)
+   }
+ }

  // Then in both methods:
- if (error?.response?.status === 422) {
-   this.validationErrorResponse = error.data
-   this.showValidationErrors()
- } else {
-   useAlert().error(
-     "An error occurred while saving the form, please try again.",
-   )
-   captureException(error)
- }
+ this.handleFormError(error)

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

@JhumanJ JhumanJ merged commit 3d09f32 into main Nov 26, 2024
5 checks passed
@JhumanJ JhumanJ deleted the fix-error-display-modal branch November 26, 2024 11:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[BUG] 500 code error after trying to edit a form
2 participants