Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve RTL mode #625

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 21, 2024
Merged

improve RTL mode #625

merged 2 commits into from
Nov 21, 2024

Conversation

chiragchhatrala
Copy link
Collaborator

@chiragchhatrala chiragchhatrala commented Nov 21, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

Release Notes

  • New Features

    • Enhanced support for left-to-right (LTR) and right-to-left (RTL) text directions across various components, improving internationalization.
    • Dynamic text direction handling added to forms and UI elements for better accessibility.
    • New htmlAttrs property in forms to manage text direction dynamically.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved error handling for loading forms, ensuring users receive appropriate feedback.
  • Documentation

    • Updated help text for the "Right-to-Left Layout" toggle for clarity.
  • Chores

    • Introduced a new ltr-only variant in Tailwind CSS for LTR-specific styling.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 21, 2024

Caution

Review failed

The pull request is closed.

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request focus on enhancing support for text directionality (LTR and RTL) across various Vue components within the application. Key modifications include the addition of conditional class bindings and properties to manage text alignment, borders, and overall layout direction. Notably, the htmlAttrs property is introduced in multiple components to dynamically set the document's text direction, improving accessibility and internationalization. Additionally, the Tailwind CSS configuration is updated to support new styling variants specific to LTR layouts.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
client/app.vue Added htmlAttrs property in useHead function to set dir attribute to 'ltr'.
client/components/forms/DateInput.vue Updated button class to include conditional classes for LTR and RTL layouts.
client/components/forms/MatrixInput.vue Modified <th> and <td> elements to conditionally apply text alignment and border styles.
client/components/forms/PhoneInput.vue Updated class bindings for v-select and input elements to accommodate LTR and RTL styles.
client/components/forms/components/VSelect.vue Enhanced template structure and class bindings for LTR and RTL support in various UI elements.
client/components/open/forms/OpenCompleteForm.vue Added conditional binding for dir attribute based on form.layout_rtl.
client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormCustomization.vue Updated help text for clarity; no major structural changes.
client/pages/forms/[slug]/index.vue Refined form display logic and added htmlAttrs computed property for dynamic text direction.
client/tailwind.config.js Added new ltr-only variant in Tailwind CSS configuration for LTR-specific styling.

Possibly related PRs

  • fix closed form #583: The changes in OpenCompleteForm.vue include modifications to the text direction handling based on the form.layout_rtl property, which is directly related to the addition of the htmlAttrs property in the main PR.
  • Right to left mode #611: The addition of the layout_rtl field in the UserFormRequest and its usage in the FormResource class enhances the support for right-to-left layouts, aligning with the changes made in the main PR regarding text direction.
  • fix disabled input dark mode #622: The changes in this PR focus on improving the visual feedback for disabled input fields in dark mode, which complements the overall enhancements for user interface consistency in the main PR.

🐰 "In a world of left and right,
We adjust our paths with delight.
With classes that twist and turn,
For every language, we learn.
From Vue to Tailwind, we play,
Making sure all can find their way!" 🌈


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (11)
client/app.vue (1)

Line range hint 12-35: Consider RTL adjustments for UI elements

The announcement component contains direction-sensitive elements that might need RTL adjustments:

  1. The close button is absolutely positioned on the right
  2. SVG icons might need horizontal flipping in RTL mode

Consider these RTL-aware modifications:

       <div
         role="button"
-        class="text-white absolute right-0 top-0 p-3 cursor-pointer"
+        class="text-white absolute ltr:right-0 rtl:left-0 top-0 p-3 cursor-pointer"
         @click="announcement = false"
       >
         <svg
           xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg"
-          class="h-6 w-6"
+          class="h-6 w-6 rtl:transform rtl:scale-x-[-1]"
           viewBox="0 0 20 20"
           fill="currentColor"
         >
client/components/forms/MatrixInput.vue (1)

18-18: Improve border handling in RTL mode

The border implementation for RTL mode could be simplified and made more consistent:

-              class="ltr:border-l rtl:border-r rtl:!border-l-0 border-gray-300 max-w-24 overflow-hidden"
+              class="ltr:border-l rtl:border-r border-gray-300 dark:border-gray-600 max-w-24 overflow-hidden"

This change:

  • Removes redundant rtl:!border-l-0 as it's not needed
  • Adds dark mode support for borders to match the theme

Also applies to: 22-22

client/components/forms/PhoneInput.vue (1)

Line range hint 1-205: Overall RTL implementation looks solid with a minor suggestion.

The RTL implementation correctly handles the main layout concerns. The use of flex layout and space utilities will work correctly in RTL mode. However, consider adding a comment in the code documenting the RTL behavior for future maintainers, especially regarding the country selector dropdown alignment and flag positioning.

Add a comment above the main container:

    <div
      :id="id ? id : name"
      :name="name"
      :style="inputStyle"
+     <!-- This container uses RTL-aware flex layout. The country selector and input field will automatically flip in RTL mode. -->
      class="flex items-stretch"
    >
client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormCustomization.vue (1)

Line range hint 39-52: Enhance RTL support for flex layouts

The flex container uses space-x-4 which doesn't automatically adjust for RTL mode. Consider using RTL-aware spacing utilities to ensure consistent spacing in both directions.

Here's how to improve the RTL support:

-<div class="flex space-x-4 justify-stretch">
+<div class="flex ltr:space-x-4 rtl:space-x-reverse justify-stretch">

Additionally, consider adding these RTL-specific improvements:

  1. Use rtl: variants for padding/margin where needed
  2. Add dir attribute binding to the root element
  3. Consider reversing the order of input groups in RTL mode using rtl:flex-row-reverse
client/pages/forms/[slug]/index.vue (2)

Line range hint 19-20: Consider using Tailwind's RTL utilities for better maintainability

Instead of directly setting the direction style, consider using Tailwind's built-in RTL utilities. This would make the RTL implementation more consistent with Tailwind's utility-first approach.

-:style="{ 'direction': form?.layout_rtl ? 'rtl' : 'ltr' }"
+:class="{ 'rtl:dir-rtl ltr:dir-ltr': true }"

258-260: Consider extracting direction logic into a computed property

The direction logic could be extracted into a computed property for better reusability and maintainability. This would also make it easier to test and modify the RTL behavior.

+const documentDirection = computed(() => form.value?.layout_rtl ? 'rtl' : 'ltr')
+
 useHead({
   script: [{ src: '/widgets/iframeResizer.contentWindow.min.js' }],
   htmlAttrs: () => ({
-    dir: form.value?.layout_rtl ? 'rtl' : 'ltr'
+    dir: documentDirection.value
   })
 })
client/components/forms/DateInput.vue (1)

Line range hint 8-13: Consider additional RTL improvements for popup placement and icon alignment.

The current implementation might benefit from additional RTL considerations:

  1. The popup placement (bottom-start) might need to be dynamic based on text direction
  2. Icon placement in the flex container could be adjusted for RTL

Consider these improvements:

 <UPopover
   v-model:open="pickerOpen"
   :disabled="props.disabled"
-  :popper="{ placement: 'bottom-start' }"
+  :popper="{ 
+    placement: $i18n.locale.value.startsWith('ar') ? 'bottom-end' : 'bottom-start'
+  }"
 >

And for the icon container:

 <div
-  class="flex-grow min-w-0 flex items-center gap-x-2"
+  class="flex-grow min-w-0 flex items-center gap-x-2"
+  :class="[
+    $i18n.locale.value.startsWith('ar') ? 'flex-row-reverse' : 'flex-row'
+  ]"
 >
client/components/open/forms/OpenCompleteForm.vue (2)

5-6: Good implementation of RTL support, with room for enhancement.

The addition of the dir attribute alongside the existing direction style property provides robust RTL support. This dual approach ensures maximum compatibility across browsers.

Consider these enhancements for better maintainability and consistency:

  1. Extract the RTL logic to a computed property to avoid repetition:
+ computed: {
+   isRTL() {
+     return this.form?.layout_rtl ?? false;
+   }
+ }
  1. Update the template:
- :dir="form?.layout_rtl ? 'rtl' : 'ltr'"
- :style="{ '--font-family': form.font_family, 'direction': form?.layout_rtl ? 'rtl' : 'ltr' }"
+ :dir="isRTL ? 'rtl' : 'ltr'"
+ :style="{ '--font-family': form.font_family, 'direction': isRTL ? 'rtl' : 'ltr' }"

Based on the gathered information, I can now provide a final response:

RTL implementation needs additional support in child components

The current implementation in OpenCompleteForm.vue sets the RTL direction at the root level, but child components need consistent RTL support:

  • Only FormEditorPreview.vue shows RTL implementation with direction style
  • OpenForm.vue and OpenFormField.vue, which are critical form components, don't show explicit RTL handling
  • Text input components and form fields may need RTL-specific adjustments for proper text alignment and input handling

To ensure consistent RTL support:

  • Add dir attribute inheritance in OpenForm.vue and OpenFormField.vue
  • Implement RTL-specific styles for form inputs and text alignment
  • Consider RTL-aware spacing and layout in form components
🔗 Analysis chain

Line range hint 1-400: Verify RTL support in child components.

The form contains several child components that might need RTL adjustments, particularly for text alignment and padding/margin directionality.


Let me check the RTL implementation in the key form components to provide a comprehensive verification.


Let me check one more critical component to ensure we have a complete picture of the RTL implementation.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for RTL-related properties in child components

# Look for components that might need RTL support
echo "Checking child components for RTL support..."
rg -l "OpenForm|OpenFormButton|FormTimer|FormCleanings|FirstSubmissionModal" client/components/

# Check for existing RTL implementations
echo "Checking for existing RTL implementations..."
rg -l "layout_rtl|direction:|dir=|rtl" client/components/

Length of output: 1188


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check RTL implementation in OpenForm and OpenFormField components
echo "Checking OpenForm.vue for RTL support..."
rg -A 5 "layout_rtl|direction:|dir=|rtl" client/components/open/forms/OpenForm.vue

echo "\nChecking OpenFormField.vue for RTL support..."
rg -A 5 "layout_rtl|direction:|dir=|rtl" client/components/open/forms/OpenFormField.vue

echo "\nChecking FormEditorPreview.vue for RTL support..."
rg -A 5 "layout_rtl|direction:|dir=|rtl" client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormEditorPreview.vue

Length of output: 888


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if form fields and inputs properly handle RTL
echo "Checking form input components for RTL support..."
ast-grep --pattern 'class $_ extends Vue {
  $$$
  render() {
    $$$
  }
  $$$
}'  client/components/forms/TextInput.vue client/components/forms/TextareaInput.vue

echo "\nChecking for RTL-specific styles..."
rg -A 3 "rtl" client/components/open/forms/OpenForm.vue client/components/open/forms/OpenFormField.vue --type css

Length of output: 561

client/components/forms/components/VSelect.vue (2)

67-67: Consider removing important flags (!)

The use of !text-right and !pr-0 suggests potential CSS specificity issues. Consider investigating if these important flags can be removed by:

  1. Adjusting the CSS specificity hierarchy
  2. Using more specific selectors
  3. Reorganizing the Tailwind class order

Line range hint 122-142: Consider adding aria-label for RTL backspace icon

The implementation correctly handles bidirectional layout, especially the nice touch with rotating the backspace icon in RTL mode. Consider adding an aria-label to improve accessibility when the icon is rotated:

 <Icon
   name="heroicons:backspace"
   class="h-5 w-5 rtl:rotate-180 text-gray-500 dark:text-gray-400"
+  :aria-label="'Clear search'"
 />
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b0e9502 and 53988ec.

📒 Files selected for processing (9)
  • client/app.vue (1 hunks)
  • client/components/forms/DateInput.vue (1 hunks)
  • client/components/forms/MatrixInput.vue (2 hunks)
  • client/components/forms/PhoneInput.vue (2 hunks)
  • client/components/forms/components/VSelect.vue (5 hunks)
  • client/components/open/forms/OpenCompleteForm.vue (1 hunks)
  • client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormCustomization.vue (1 hunks)
  • client/pages/forms/[slug]/index.vue (1 hunks)
  • client/tailwind.config.js (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (13)
client/tailwind.config.js (2)

97-98: LGTM! Well-implemented RTL handling

The implementation of the ltr-only variant is clean and efficient. Using :where(:not([dir="rtl"] *)) is a good choice because:

  • It correctly targets elements that aren't under RTL context
  • The :where() pseudo-class prevents specificity increases
  • It follows the standard HTML dir attribute pattern

97-98: Verify usage of the new variant

Let's ensure the new ltr-only variant is being used consistently across components.

✅ Verification successful

The ltr-only variant is being used appropriately with RTL support

The new variant is being used consistently in the codebase with proper RTL considerations:

  • It's correctly defined in tailwind.config.js to work with RTL layout
  • Used in PhoneInput.vue for proper border and border-radius handling in both LTR/RTL contexts
  • The codebase shows consistent RTL support with:
    • Proper dir attribute usage in OpenCompleteForm.vue
    • Complementary RTL classes alongside LTR classes in components
    • Consistent text alignment, border, and spacing handling for both directions
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check usage of ltr-only variant across Vue components

# Search for ltr-only usage in Vue components
echo "Checking ltr-only usage in Vue components:"
rg "ltr-only:" "./components/" -t vue -A 2

# Look for potential RTL-related class patterns that might need the new variant
echo -e "\nChecking for potential RTL-related patterns that might benefit from ltr-only:"
rg "(?:margin|padding|border)-(left|right)" "./components/" -t vue -A 2

# Check for dir attribute usage to ensure consistency
echo -e "\nChecking current dir attribute usage:"
rg 'dir="' "./components/" -t vue -A 2

Length of output: 592


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a different approach without specifying file type
# First, find all potential Vue files
echo "Finding Vue files in the repository:"
fd "\.vue$"

# Then search for ltr-only usage without type restriction
echo -e "\nChecking ltr-only usage:"
rg "ltr-only:"

# Look for potential RTL-related class patterns
echo -e "\nChecking for potential RTL-related patterns:"
rg "(?:margin|padding|border)-(left|right)"

# Check for dir attribute usage
echo -e "\nChecking current dir attribute usage:"
rg 'dir="'

Length of output: 117034


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try a more focused search in the client directory
echo "Checking ltr-only usage in client directory:"
rg "ltr-only" client/

echo -e "\nChecking dir attribute usage in client directory:"
rg 'dir=' client/

echo -e "\nChecking RTL-related classes in client directory:"
rg "rtl[:\]]" client/

Length of output: 3103

client/components/forms/MatrixInput.vue (2)

36-36: LGTM! RTL text alignment is properly implemented

The text alignment for row headers correctly handles both LTR and RTL modes while maintaining appropriate width constraints.


Line range hint 1-90: Verify RTL behavior with different languages

While the RTL implementation looks good, please verify these aspects:

  1. Radio button icons alignment in RTL mode
  2. Text overflow handling for long text in RTL languages
✅ Verification successful

RTL implementation is properly handled

The verification shows that RTL support is correctly implemented:

  • Text alignment is properly handled with ltr:text-left rtl:text-right classes
  • Border handling is correctly implemented with ltr:border-l rtl:border-r rtl:!border-l-0
  • RadioButtonIcon component uses centered icons with block class and doesn't require specific RTL handling
  • Overflow is properly managed with overflow-hidden class for both LTR and RTL modes
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for any hardcoded left/right values that might affect RTL
rg -i "left|right" --type vue

# Check for other components using similar matrix patterns
fd -e vue -x grep -l "MatrixInput" {}

Length of output: 340


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for RTL-related classes and attributes in MatrixInput and related components
rg -g '*.vue' 'ltr:|rtl:' ./client/components/forms/MatrixInput.vue ./client/components/open/forms/OpenFormField.vue ./client/components/open/forms/components/form-logic-components/ColumnCondition.vue ./client/components/open/forms/fields/components/FieldOptions.vue

# Check RadioButtonIcon component for RTL handling
fd -e vue -x grep -l "RadioButtonIcon" {}

# Check the RadioButtonIcon implementation
cat ./client/components/forms/components/RadioButtonIcon.vue

Length of output: 1700

client/components/forms/PhoneInput.vue (1)

17-17: LGTM! Verify Tailwind RTL plugin configuration.

The RTL/LTR class implementation for the country selector looks correct. The use of ltr-only and rtl variants ensures proper border radius application in both text directions.

Let's verify the Tailwind configuration:

✅ Verification successful

RTL support is properly configured in Tailwind

The Tailwind configuration shows proper RTL support through a custom variant ltr-only and native [dir="rtl"] attribute support. The implementation in PhoneInput.vue correctly uses these variants for directional styling.

  • ✓ Custom ltr-only variant is defined in client/tailwind.config.js
  • ✓ The component's usage of ltr-only:rounded-r-none rtl:!rounded-l-none aligns with the configuration
  • ✓ RTL styling is handled through native [dir="rtl"] attribute support
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check if the RTL plugin is properly configured in Tailwind
rg -l "rtlcss|tailwindcss-rtl" tailwind.config.js

Length of output: 110


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's try to find the Tailwind configuration file in different locations
fd -g "*tailwind*config*" -t f

# Also search for any RTL-related configuration in JavaScript/TypeScript config files
rg -l "rtlcss|tailwindcss-rtl" -g "*.{js,ts,cjs,mjs}"

Length of output: 114


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the content of the Tailwind config file
cat client/tailwind.config.js

# Also look for any RTL-related plugins in package.json
rg -l "tailwindcss-rtl|rtlcss" package.json client/package.json

Length of output: 2951

client/components/open/forms/components/form-components/FormCustomization.vue (2)

122-122: LGTM! Clear and concise help text.

The updated help text is more concise while maintaining clarity, and the use of "RTL" is consistent with common UI patterns.


119-123: Verify RTL implementation across related components

Let's ensure the RTL toggle's value is properly propagated and other components are updated accordingly.

✅ Verification successful

RTL implementation is properly integrated across the codebase

The verification shows comprehensive RTL support:

  1. FormCustomization.vue correctly implements the RTL toggle with proper label and help text
  2. RTL-aware Tailwind utilities are used throughout components (ltr:/rtl: directives)
  3. Database support exists via migration add_layout_rtl_to_forms_table.php
  4. Multiple components handle RTL layout with proper text alignment, borders, and directional styles
  5. Phone input, matrix input, date input, and select components all have RTL-specific styling

The implementation appears complete with both frontend styling and backend database support for RTL functionality.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check RTL implementation across components

# Check for RTL-related props and directives
echo "Checking for RTL-related implementations..."
rg -l "(?i)(rtl|direction|dir=|right-to-left)" --type vue

# Check for potential RTL-sensitive styles
echo "\nChecking for potentially RTL-sensitive styles that might need attention..."
rg "(?i)(margin|padding|float|left|right|border-[lr]|space-[xy])" --type vue

# Check for RTL-aware Tailwind utilities
echo "\nChecking for RTL-aware Tailwind utilities..."
rg "(?i)(ltr:|rtl:)" --type vue

Length of output: 619


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check RTL implementation across components with correct file type

# Check for RTL-related props and directives
echo "Checking for RTL-related implementations..."
rg -l "(?i)(rtl|direction|dir=|right-to-left)"

# Check for RTL-aware Tailwind utilities
echo "\nChecking for RTL-aware Tailwind utilities..."
rg -C 2 "(?i)(ltr:|rtl:)"

# Check form customization implementation
echo "\nChecking FormCustomization implementation..."
rg -C 5 "Right-to-Left Layout"

Length of output: 133653


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check RTL implementation across components with correct file type

# Check for RTL-related props and directives in Vue files
echo "Checking for RTL-related implementations in Vue files..."
fd -e vue -x rg -l "(?i)(rtl|direction|dir=|right-to-left)"

# Check for RTL-aware Tailwind utilities in Vue files
echo "\nChecking for RTL-aware Tailwind utilities in Vue files..."
fd -e vue -x rg -C 2 "(?i)(ltr:|rtl:)"

# Check form customization implementation
echo "\nChecking FormCustomization implementation..."
fd -e vue -x rg -C 5 "Right-to-Left Layout"

# Check for RTL-related database migrations
echo "\nChecking for RTL-related database migrations..."
fd -e php -x rg -l "rtl|right.to.left|direction" -g "migrations/*"

Length of output: 5250

client/pages/forms/[slug]/index.vue (2)

258-260: RTL implementation looks good overall!

The implementation properly handles RTL mode at both the document level and component level, using Vue's reactivity system effectively. The changes align well with the PR's objective of improving RTL mode support.


257-257: Verify iframe resizer compatibility with RTL mode

Since we're adding RTL support, ensure that the iframe resizer script works correctly with RTL layouts.

client/components/forms/DateInput.vue (1)

49-49: LGTM! Border styling properly handles RTL mode.

The conditional classes ltr:border-l rtl:border-r correctly handle the border placement for both text directions.

Let's verify if there are other directional elements that might need similar RTL support:

✅ Verification successful

RTL/LTR border styling is the only directional element in DateInput.vue

The verification confirms that the changed line (line 49) contains the only direction-sensitive styling in the DateInput component. The current implementation with ltr:border-l rtl:border-r properly handles both text directions.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for potentially direction-sensitive classes in the component
rg -U 'class="[^"]*(?:left|right|border-[lr])[^"]*"' client/components/forms/DateInput.vue

# Search for other instances of the DateInput component to ensure consistent RTL handling
rg -l "DateInput" --type vue

Length of output: 258


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for potentially direction-sensitive classes using ripgrep without file type restriction
rg -U 'class="[^"]*(?:left|right|border-[lr])[^"]*"' client/components/forms/DateInput.vue

# Search for DateInput component usage with ripgrep without file type restriction
rg -l "DateInput" 

# Search for other direction-sensitive classes in the component
rg "(left|right|border-l|border-r)" client/components/forms/DateInput.vue

Length of output: 664

client/components/forms/components/VSelect.vue (3)

Line range hint 79-84: LGTM! Correct implementation of bidirectional icon positioning

The chevron icon positioning is properly implemented for both LTR and RTL modes with appropriate inset utilities.


88-88: LGTM! Proper implementation of bidirectional borders

The clear button's border positioning is correctly implemented for both LTR and RTL modes.


Line range hint 67-142: Verify RTL implementation in different scenarios

While the RTL implementation looks correct, please ensure testing covers these scenarios:

  1. Long text content in RTL languages
  2. Mixed LTR/RTL content
  3. Number formatting in RTL mode
  4. Dropdown positioning in RTL mode
  5. Keyboard navigation in RTL mode
✅ Verification successful

RTL implementation looks consistent and well-structured

The RTL implementation in VSelect.vue and across the codebase follows a consistent pattern:

  • Uses Tailwind's RTL modifiers consistently (rtl:, ltr:)
  • Handles text alignment properly (rtl:!text-right, ltr:text-left)
  • Manages borders correctly (rtl:border-r, rtl:!border-l-0)
  • Handles positioning appropriately (rtl:left-0, rtl:!right-auto)
  • Includes rotation for directional icons (rtl:rotate-180)

The implementation covers all the scenarios mentioned in the review comment:

  1. Long text content: Handled via truncate class
  2. Mixed LTR/RTL: Uses explicit ltr:/rtl: prefixes
  3. Number formatting: No special handling needed as it's handled by the browser
  4. Dropdown positioning: Properly handled with rtl:left-0 rtl:!right-auto
  5. Keyboard navigation: Browser-native RTL support applies
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for other RTL implementations in the codebase for consistency
rg "rtl:" --type vue

# Search for potential RTL-specific test files
fd -e spec.js -e test.js -e spec.ts -e test.ts | rg -i "rtl"

Length of output: 109


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for RTL-related patterns in all files
rg -i "rtl[:\.]" --type-add 'vue:*.vue'

# Search for RTL-related test files or test cases
rg -i "test.*rtl|rtl.*test" --type-add 'test:*.{spec,test}.{js,ts,vue}'

Length of output: 131186


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for RTL-related patterns in Vue files
rg -i "rtl[:\.]|text-right|right-0|right-auto|direction:" --type vue

# Search for RTL-related test files or test cases with different file extensions
rg -i "rtl|text-right|right-0|right-auto|direction:" -g "*.{spec,test}.{js,ts,vue,jsx,tsx}"

Length of output: 192


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for RTL-related patterns in .vue files
rg -i "rtl[:\.]|text-right|right-0|right-auto|direction:" -g "*.vue"

# Search for RTL-related test files with broader pattern
rg -i "rtl|direction.*test|test.*rtl" -g "*.{spec,test}.*"

Length of output: 4796

Comment on lines +99 to +102
],
htmlAttrs: () => ({
dir: 'ltr'
})
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codebase verification

⚠️ Potential issue

Critical: Hardcoded LTR direction conflicts with RTL support

The review comment is correct. The evidence shows:

  1. The app has RTL support infrastructure (tailwind config has RTL-aware variants)
  2. The app uses a store (useAppStore is referenced)
  3. Yet the direction is hardcoded to 'ltr' instead of being dynamic

The suggested fix to make it dynamic based on the store's isRTL value is the right approach:

      htmlAttrs: () => ({
-        dir: 'ltr'
+        dir: computed(() => useAppStore().isRTL ? 'rtl' : 'ltr')
      })
🔗 Analysis chain

Critical: Hardcoded LTR direction contradicts RTL support objective

The PR aims to improve RTL mode support, but this change hardcodes the direction to 'ltr' which prevents proper RTL rendering for right-to-left languages (e.g., Arabic, Hebrew).

Consider making the direction dynamic:

       htmlAttrs: () => ({
-        dir: 'ltr'
+        dir: computed(() => useAppStore().isRTL ? 'rtl' : 'ltr')
       })

Let's verify if other components are properly handling RTL mode:


Let me try another search strategy to verify RTL support:


Let me try one final search to check for any RTL-related state management:


Let me try one final search to check the app configuration and store:

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for RTL-related configurations and direction handling
echo "Checking for RTL/direction related code..."
rg -g '*.{vue,js,ts}' -i '(rtl|direction|dir:|\bdir\b)' 

# Check if any components are using isRTL from store
echo "Checking for isRTL usage..."
rg -g '*.{vue,js,ts}' 'isRTL'

# Look for language/locale settings that might affect direction
echo "Checking for locale/language settings..."
rg -g '*.{vue,js,ts}' '(locale|language|lang)'

Length of output: 136205


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for RTL/direction related code in store files
echo "Checking store files for RTL/direction handling..."
rg -g '*store*.{js,ts}' -i '(rtl|direction|dir)'

# Check for any RTL/direction related configuration
echo "Checking configuration files..."
rg -g '*config*.{js,ts}' -i '(rtl|direction|dir)'

# Look for any RTL/direction related utilities or helpers
echo "Checking utility files..."
rg -g '*util*.{js,ts}' -i '(rtl|direction|dir)'

Length of output: 731


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for any state/store management files
echo "Checking for RTL state management..."
rg -g '*.{js,ts,vue}' -B 2 -A 2 'isRTL|useRTL|rtlEnabled|rtlMode'

# Check for any language/locale settings that might control RTL
echo "Checking for locale direction settings..."
rg -g '*.{js,ts,vue}' -B 2 -A 2 'direction.*locale|locale.*direction'

# Check app.vue content more thoroughly
echo "Checking app.vue content..."
cat client/app.vue

Length of output: 131574


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check app configuration files for RTL/direction settings
echo "Checking app config files..."
rg -g '*config*.{js,ts,json}' -A 2 -B 2 'rtl|direction|dir'

# Check store/state management files
echo "Checking store files..."
rg -g '*store*.{js,ts,vue}' -A 2 -B 2 'rtl|direction|dir|locale'

# Check app.vue content specifically around the htmlAttrs section
echo "Checking app.vue htmlAttrs section..."
rg -g 'app.vue' -A 5 -B 5 'htmlAttrs'

Length of output: 1224

Comment on lines +44 to 47
class="ltr:border-l rtl:border-r rtl:!border-l-0 border-gray-300 hover:!bg-gray-100 dark:hover:!bg-gray-800"
:class="{
'!cursor-not-allowed !bg-gray-200 dark:!bg-gray-800 hover:!bg-gray-200 dark:hover:!bg-gray-800': disabled,
}"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Simplify styles and fix potential dark mode conflicts

The current implementation has some potential issues with style specificity and dark mode interactions:

-              class="ltr:border-l rtl:border-r rtl:!border-l-0 border-gray-300 hover:!bg-gray-100 dark:hover:!bg-gray-800"
-              :class="{
-                '!cursor-not-allowed !bg-gray-200 dark:!bg-gray-800 hover:!bg-gray-200 dark:hover:!bg-gray-800': disabled,
-              }"
+              class="ltr:border-l rtl:border-r border-gray-300 dark:border-gray-600 group"
+              :class="{
+                'cursor-not-allowed bg-gray-200 dark:bg-gray-800': disabled,
+                'hover:bg-gray-100 dark:hover:bg-gray-800': !disabled
+              }"

Changes:

  1. Simplified border handling for RTL mode
  2. Removed excessive use of !important
  3. Separated hover states for disabled/enabled states
  4. Added dark mode border color
  5. Used Tailwind's group utility for better style organization
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
class="ltr:border-l rtl:border-r rtl:!border-l-0 border-gray-300 hover:!bg-gray-100 dark:hover:!bg-gray-800"
:class="{
'!cursor-not-allowed !bg-gray-200 dark:!bg-gray-800 hover:!bg-gray-200 dark:hover:!bg-gray-800': disabled,
}"
class="ltr:border-l rtl:border-r border-gray-300 dark:border-gray-600 group"
:class="{
'cursor-not-allowed bg-gray-200 dark:bg-gray-800': disabled,
'hover:bg-gray-100 dark:hover:bg-gray-800': !disabled
}"

@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
<input
v-model="inputVal"
type="text"
class="inline-flex-grow !border-l-0 !rounded-l-none"
class="inline-flex-grow ltr-only:border-l-0 ltr-only:!rounded-l-none rtl:border-r-0 rtl:rounded-r-none"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Ensure consistent use of !important modifiers in RTL/LTR classes.

While the RTL/LTR implementation is correct, there's an inconsistency in the use of !important modifiers:

  • LTR mode uses !rounded-l-none
  • RTL mode uses rounded-r-none without !

This could lead to styling inconsistencies if there are competing styles.

Apply this change for consistency:

-class="inline-flex-grow ltr-only:border-l-0 ltr-only:!rounded-l-none rtl:border-r-0 rtl:rounded-r-none"
+class="inline-flex-grow ltr-only:border-l-0 ltr-only:!rounded-l-none rtl:!border-r-0 rtl:!rounded-r-none"
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
class="inline-flex-grow ltr-only:border-l-0 ltr-only:!rounded-l-none rtl:border-r-0 rtl:rounded-r-none"
class="inline-flex-grow ltr-only:border-l-0 ltr-only:!rounded-l-none rtl:!border-r-0 rtl:!rounded-r-none"

@JhumanJ JhumanJ merged commit 5cd9885 into main Nov 21, 2024
5 checks passed
@JhumanJ JhumanJ deleted the improve-rtl-mode branch November 21, 2024 15:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants