Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

improve email notfication migration #602

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 24, 2024

Conversation

chiragchhatrala
Copy link
Collaborator

@chiragchhatrala chiragchhatrala commented Oct 24, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Added a dry run option for the email notification migration, allowing users to preview changes before applying them.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Streamlined integration update process, reducing unnecessary operations and improving efficiency.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 24, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes involve the EmailNotificationMigration class, where a new --dry option has been added to the console command for a dry run of the migration process. The command signature has been updated to accept this option, allowing users to log intended changes without applying them. The updateIntegration method's signature has also been modified to include a new $isDryRun parameter, which alters the method's logic to log changes instead of executing them when the dry run is enabled.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
api/app/Console/Commands/EmailNotificationMigration.php Updated command signature to include --dry option for logging changes without applying them. Modified updateIntegration method to accept $isDryRun parameter and refined logic to log intended updates when dry run is enabled. Removed unconditional save operations.

Poem

In the code where rabbits play,
Logic refined in a clever way.
With conditions set just right,
Integration shines so bright!
Save with care, no more haste,
In this code, we find our grace. 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
api/app/Console/Commands/EmailNotificationMigration.php (1)

Line range hint 79-90: Add null checks for notification data fields.

The code assumes that notification_sender exists in the existing data. Consider adding null checks or default values for all fields to prevent potential issues.

Apply this fix:

 } else if ($integration->integration_id === 'submission_confirmation' && isset($existingData->notification_subject)) {
     $integration->integration_id = 'email';
     $integration->data = [
         'send_to' => $this->getMentionHtml($integration->form),
-        'sender_name' => $existingData->notification_sender,
+        'sender_name' => $existingData->notification_sender ?? 'OpnForm',
         'subject' => $existingData->notification_subject,
-        'email_content' => $existingData->notification_body,
-        'include_submission_data' => $existingData->notifications_include_submission,
+        'email_content' => $existingData->notification_body ?? '',
+        'include_submission_data' => $existingData->notifications_include_submission ?? true,
         'include_hidden_fields_submission_data' => false,
         'reply_to' => $existingData->confirmation_reply_to ?? null
     ];
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 46359fb and bcabd1b.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • api/app/Console/Commands/EmailNotificationMigration.php (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
api/app/Console/Commands/EmailNotificationMigration.php (2)

Line range hint 68-92: Verify transaction safety for the migration.

While the code handles errors and uses chunking, consider wrapping the integration updates in a transaction to ensure data consistency in case of failures.

Let's check if transactions are used elsewhere in similar migrations:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for transaction usage in migrations
rg -B 2 -A 2 "DB::transaction|->transaction" --type php app/Console/Commands/

Consider wrapping the update in a transaction:

 public function updateIntegration(FormIntegration $integration)
 {
     if (!$integration->form) {
         return;
     }
+    return \DB::transaction(function() use ($integration) {
         $existingData = $integration->data;
         // ... existing code ...
+    });
 }

Line range hint 68-78: Consider validating email addresses before saving.

While the logic for handling email integration looks good, it might be worth validating the email addresses in notification_emails before saving to ensure they are in the correct format.

Let's check if there's any existing email validation in the codebase:

Consider adding email validation:

 if ($integration->integration_id === 'email' && isset($existingData->notification_emails)) {
+    $emails = is_array($existingData->notification_emails) 
+        ? $existingData->notification_emails 
+        : [$existingData->notification_emails];
+    foreach ($emails as $email) {
+        if (!filter_var($email, FILTER_VALIDATE_EMAIL)) {
+            throw new \InvalidArgumentException("Invalid email format: {$email}");
+        }
+    }
     $integration->data = [

Comment on lines 90 to 92
return $integration->save();
}
return $integration->save();
return;
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider adding logging for audit purposes.

Since this is a one-time migration script, it would be helpful to log successful migrations for audit purposes and troubleshooting.

Consider adding logging:

     if ($integration->integration_id === 'email' && isset($existingData->notification_emails)) {
         // ... existing code ...
+        $this->info("Migrated email integration {$integration->id} for form {$integration->form_id}");
         return $integration->save();
     } else if ($integration->integration_id === 'submission_confirmation' && isset($existingData->notification_subject)) {
         // ... existing code ...
+        $this->info("Migrated submission confirmation integration {$integration->id} for form {$integration->form_id}");
         return $integration->save();
     }
+    $this->warn("Skipped integration {$integration->id} - no matching conditions");
     return;

Committable suggestion was skipped due to low confidence.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
api/app/Console/Commands/EmailNotificationMigration.php (3)

64-64: Consider documenting the return type.

The method has inconsistent return types (boolean|void). Consider adding a return type declaration and documenting the expected behavior.

-    public function updateIntegration(FormIntegration $integration, $isDryRun = false)
+    public function updateIntegration(FormIntegration $integration, bool $isDryRun = false): ?bool

Line range hint 70-85: Enhance data validation and dry run logging.

The email notification data structure validation could be more robust, and the dry run logging could provide more context.

Consider these improvements:

     if ($integration->integration_id === 'email' && isset($existingData->notification_emails)) {
+        // Validate email format
+        $emails = is_array($existingData->notification_emails) 
+            ? $existingData->notification_emails 
+            : [$existingData->notification_emails];
+        
+        foreach ($emails as $email) {
+            if (!filter_var($email, FILTER_VALIDATE_EMAIL)) {
+                $this->warn("Invalid email format found: {$email}");
+            }
+        }
+
         $newData = [
             'send_to' => $existingData->notification_emails ?? null,
             'sender_name' => 'OpnForm',
             'subject' => 'New form submission',
             'email_content' => 'Hello there 👋 <br>New form submission received.',
             'include_submission_data' => true,
             'include_hidden_fields_submission_data' => false,
             'reply_to' => $existingData->notification_reply_to ?? null
         ];
         if ($isDryRun) {
-            $this->info('Dry run: Would update integration ' . $integration->id . ' with data: ' . json_encode($newData));
+            $this->info("Dry run: Would update email integration {$integration->id} for form {$integration->form_id}");
+            $this->line("Current emails: " . json_encode($existingData->notification_emails));
+            $this->line("New configuration: " . json_encode($newData, JSON_PRETTY_PRINT));
         } else {

Line range hint 86-104: Standardize return behavior and improve error handling.

The method has inconsistent return behavior and could benefit from better error handling.

Consider this refactor:

     } elseif ($integration->integration_id === 'submission_confirmation' && isset($existingData->notification_subject)) {
         $newData = [
             'send_to' => $this->getMentionHtml($integration->form),
             'sender_name' => $existingData->notification_sender,
             'subject' => $existingData->notification_subject,
             'email_content' => $existingData->notification_body,
             'include_submission_data' => $existingData->notifications_include_submission,
             'include_hidden_fields_submission_data' => false,
             'reply_to' => $existingData->confirmation_reply_to ?? null
         ];
         if ($isDryRun) {
-            $this->info('Dry run: Would update integration ' . $integration->id . ' with data: ' . json_encode($newData));
+            $this->info("Dry run: Would update submission confirmation {$integration->id} for form {$integration->form_id}");
+            $this->line("New configuration: " . json_encode($newData, JSON_PRETTY_PRINT));
+            return true;
         } else {
             $integration->integration_id = 'email';
             $integration->data = $newData;
             return $integration->save();
         }
     }
-    return;
+    $this->warn("No updates required for integration {$integration->id}");
+    return false;
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 5bc4848 and 3a874ca.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • api/app/Console/Commands/EmailNotificationMigration.php (5 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
api/app/Console/Commands/EmailNotificationMigration.php (1)

16-16: LGTM! Well-documented command option.

The dry run option is clearly documented and follows Laravel command conventions.

Comment on lines +44 to +49
$isDryRun = $this->option('dry');

$query->with('form')->chunk(100, function ($integrations) use ($progressBar, $isDryRun) {
foreach ($integrations as $integration) {
try {
$this->updateIntegration($integration);
$this->updateIntegration($integration, $isDryRun);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider adding summary statistics logging.

While error handling is present, it would be helpful to track the overall success/failure rate of the migration.

Add counters and summary logging:

     $isDryRun = $this->option('dry');
+    $successCount = 0;
+    $errorCount = 0;

-    $query->with('form')->chunk(100, function ($integrations) use ($progressBar, $isDryRun) {
+    $query->with('form')->chunk(100, function ($integrations) use ($progressBar, $isDryRun, &$successCount, &$errorCount) {
         foreach ($integrations as $integration) {
             try {
                 $this->updateIntegration($integration, $isDryRun);
+                $successCount++;
             } catch (\Exception $e) {
                 $this->error('Error updating integration ' . $integration->id . '. Error: ' . $e->getMessage());
                 ray($e);
+                $errorCount++;
             }
             $progressBar->advance();
         }
     });

     $progressBar->finish();
     $this->newLine();
+    $this->info("Migration completed with {$successCount} successful updates and {$errorCount} failures");
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
$isDryRun = $this->option('dry');
$query->with('form')->chunk(100, function ($integrations) use ($progressBar, $isDryRun) {
foreach ($integrations as $integration) {
try {
$this->updateIntegration($integration);
$this->updateIntegration($integration, $isDryRun);
$isDryRun = $this->option('dry');
$successCount = 0;
$errorCount = 0;
$query->with('form')->chunk(100, function ($integrations) use ($progressBar, $isDryRun, &$successCount, &$errorCount) {
foreach ($integrations as $integration) {
try {
$this->updateIntegration($integration, $isDryRun);
$successCount++;
} catch (\Exception $e) {
$this->error('Error updating integration ' . $integration->id . '. Error: ' . $e->getMessage());
ray($e);
$errorCount++;
}
$progressBar->advance();
}
});
$progressBar->finish();
$this->newLine();
$this->info("Migration completed with {$successCount} successful updates and {$errorCount} failures");

@JhumanJ JhumanJ merged commit 6bdce23 into main Oct 24, 2024
5 checks passed
@JhumanJ JhumanJ deleted the improve-email-notfication-migration branch October 24, 2024 13:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants