Add xonsh shell in dynamic

[GouravSardana]

We have to make autocomplete feature for dynamic. To make it work we need to create a xonsh shell. Still confused ?
Ref to this - xonsh

How does it actually works?

When a user types dynamic. It will redirect to a different shell on the same terminal and we can use autocomplete in that shell because our normal terminal doesn't allow you to autocomplete.

Ref first 1 sec of GIF [When he type gitsome, Another shell got popup [still confused? Tried installing gitsome in local and type gitsome in terminal]]-

Credit for xonsh - xonsh
Credit for Gitsome - Gitsome

[sudojarvis]

Hi, I would like to work on this issue. Could you please give some head start?
It would be helpful.

[GouravSardana]

Go ahead buddy @sudojarvis

[sudojarvis]

@GouravSardana gitsome uses xonsh shell. I have to do a similar thing right?

[sudojarvis]

Do we have to do it from scratch or we can merge it from xonsh.

[GouravSardana]

@sudojarvis That’s correct gitsome uses the xonsh shell.
no no, you don’t have to create it from scratch just leverage the xonsh and try to replicate the flow from gitsome

[sudojarvis]

@GouravSardana could you please assign the issue to me under GSSOC'22.

[GouravSardana]

Np. Work on this issue. Don’t worry about assigning the issues. I’ll take care of that

[sudojarvis]

Kazam_screencast_00018.mp4

@GouravSardana Till now it is auto-completing, what I typed previously. But I have used code from gitsome. Is this fine?

[GouravSardana]

@sudojarvis Is this using XONSH ? I couldn't see this going to the xonsh terminal just like in gitsome.

• If I type gitsome, It'll open up a new customize terminal where we can do autocomplete
• Is this autocomplete based on our history or the argument which we have ?

[sudojarvis]

@sudojarvis Is this using XONSH ? I couldn't see this going to the xonsh terminal just like in git

• If I type gitsome, It'll open up a new customize terminal where we can do autocomplete
• Is this autocomplete based on our history or the argument which we have ?

@GouravSardana yes, to 1st two questions. And updated the video watch from 2:35.

[sudojarvis]

• Is this autocomplete based on our history or the argument which we have ?
  based on our history

[GouravSardana]

Okay but i think this autocomplete should work based on both things. One is history and other is args.
As of now, can you make a PR, I’ll review it locally and will give you suggestions accordingly

[GouravSardana]

@sudojarvis Any update ?