-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add convenient exploit for _IO_wide_data
#2442
base: dev
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
We should keep a proxy |
Oh I see. In case someone use pwntools in library mode right? Should I just write |
Since I work on an old branch, should I update my branch with rebase when I'm done and write down the changelog? |
How to meet the doctest requirement both in Python 2 and Python 3? |
I believe the latest failure is not about bytes' repr, but rather about bytes constructor from array. You can use The documentation should be py3-native (or even py3-only). Back when porting to py3, I implemented a custom doctest comparator for py2 that should accept enough py3 to pass the tests successfully. |
So do you mean that I should replace |
After glibc 2.35, one of exploitable paths is FSOP, utilizing unchecked vtable for
_IO_wide_data
. This PR brings related structures in Python and convenient methods to create out-of-box payload.WIP.