Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update 2023-10-04 Five Star Reviews are Overrated.md #18

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
4 changes: 3 additions & 1 deletion blog/2023-10-04 Five Star Reviews are Overrated.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ Summary
* We can define the cdf for X<=x_observed
* Set p such that the observed result is a median for the CDF

Comment: setting p so that the observed result is a median is not the same as a max entropy approach? CDF and entropy of different sets of states are different tings? I added a script to calc max entropy for coins and then stars. I haven't yet confirmed not equivalent to taking CDF approach but I don't think CDF factors in the concavity needed to land on the max entropy solution.

##### Binomial Solved as Multinomial
See 2023-10-04 Wolfram Notebook

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -91,4 +93,4 @@ Finally
* And relate all this to the binomial problem solved in Nassim's blog

### Application Notes
* This is mainly useful in the small sample space, where you have a handful of reviews (with less you can't do much, with more than 30 or so the binomial starts to converge to it's true generating distribution (law of large numbers))
* This is mainly useful in the small sample space, where you have a handful of reviews (with less you can't do much, with more than 30 or so the binomial starts to converge to it's true generating distribution (law of large numbers))